Instigator / Pro
3
1350
rating
29
debates
20.69%
won
Topic
#2734

Eurocentric Lies Should Be Abolished Immediately: Prove Me Wrong

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
6
Better sources
0
4
Better legibility
1
2
Better conduct
2
2

After 2 votes and with 11 points ahead, the winner is...

Benjamin
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
One day
Max argument characters
8,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
14
1777
rating
79
debates
76.58%
won
Description

As of 2021, the world's history has been destroyed and rebranded by Europeans across the globe. These false teaching and massive amounts of disinformation has been a major problem to societies around the globe. Europeans have literally built an entire educational system that spreads these lies on a continuous basis. In the process, authentic history has been either removed, hidden or completely destroyed to keep this charade operating at full capacity. Not only has the Eurocentric lies made its way into mainstream society; these lies have made their way into religion. From American history to ancient Africa...it's time to expose and eradicate this ridiculous system of deceit.

If you can prove that European culture isn't built on lies, then they're welcome to take this debate. I only deal with facts/evidence, so please leave your emotions at the door.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro never attempts to attain BoP, which is ironic since they are calling for apparently obvious lies to be abolished but never try to abolish any (not even showing one debunked european crime statistic, while claiming they exist must exist). What they do instead, is try to make SJWs look bad in a poorly done mockery; even claiming whites were unable to thrive on their own (which would logically make them enslaving Africans an impossibility).

Con immediately shows that Europeans live in Europe, thus are not sneaking in everywhere to lie to everyone as some type of boogeyman. Some of the debate goes into the history of Viking exploration (con eventually used a source to prove it, to which pro kept claiming that's stupid without refuting it).

Sources:
Con offered so many more than the one named above, but ultimately pro's lack of engagement even to disprove them leaves no doubt.

S&G:
Pro decided he was opposed to people being able to read his case, so set most of it in all bold.

Conduct:
My gut reaction was conduct too, but failing to engage with the topic is already well represented in the argument allotment.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro claims that the Bible was white washed. He provides zero evidence of such. Pro claims Columbus never set foot in America. He Provides no evidence. Pro claims there is no "sub saharan Africa", also using no evidence. He says crime statistics are also debunked on a regular basis, but provides no evidence. His arguments are muddled by his claims and evidence conflicting each other. In contrast, Con clearly delivers the facts that Columbus did find America, and that the mainstream media proves that Europe did not lie with significant detriments to information or the population.