I Cut My Hair
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 3 votes and with 8 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 1,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
I: First person pronoun. I am referring to myself, and only me. This subject is about me.
Cut: Shorting of the hair.
Hair: Any of the fine threadlike strands growing from the skin of humans, mammals, and some other animals. (The hair that grows out of my scalp.)
I have very little idea what I genuinely just read.
I cannot grasp almost any of the poetry by Con but there is actual argumentation in it that at times is coherent:
"
I see you've cut your hair my dear
I can see your face from ear to ear.
"
Then there is sexual intonation to the waxing of stuff that I don't really want to go into. I literally don't understand this debate.
Con argued that Pro did cut her hair, Pro didn't argue and just gave proof that a woman she claims to be her has had her hair cut without even explaining what's inside the link.
What?
Args: It is to Pro. Pro has essentially given a source which proves that she had cut her hair(To Con: You missed an opportunity in which since Pro had never used a photo for a profile before, it is essentially impossible to prove that the person that had her hair cut is Pro). Con ADMITS Pro has cut her hair in his poems, while making no arguments. A foregone conclusion and concession.
Sources: Pro used sources, Con didn't.
S&G: Both persons spelled correctly and everything is readable. Tie.
Conduct: Technically Con had went great lengths admitting that Pro has cut her hair and wrote poems unrelated to his standpoint. This shows that Con doesn't even care about winning this debate. To Pro.
As this "debate" is a bit tongue-in-cheeky, I will offer first, in comments, my #10 as a thematic intercession of my composition. And now, the vote, just as cheeky, but with a bit of serious banter:
Argument: Sorry, Jasmine, but the creativity Zed displays is too good to be overwhelmed by a few words from you which were, after all, complementary to Zed. The poetry, Zed, as argument, is superb. points to Con.
Sourcing: Well, pro's sourcing was limited to to references to the same blog post, which did, I'll admit, graphically present the proof of the debate resolution: Jasmine did, indeed, cut her hair. As that was the point of Pro's argument, I'd have to say, in spite of Zed's clever use of sourcing material for his argument, a no-brainer. Pro wins these points.
S&G: a tie. Pro's graphics demonstrate as graphic grammar just as much left on the floor as Con's many strands of poetic grammar, and both spelled eloquently.
Conduct: A difficult choice. I, too, agreeing with Con, think pro's "before" was preferable to her "after," but I must admit bias toward more hair than less. However, Con's beginning stanza of R1 was a clever, if suggestive tilt toward "down there" a but further than pro's rebuttal suggests. Have to call this one a tie.
Conclusion: Zed wins by a hair.
It is now, hoe.
Hey...It's not a big deal.
Jasmine cut her hair.
The poetry was fun.
The debate was never going to be
A serious one.
Thanks for taking the time to vote.
How does Con get get the args? You were the guy who voted against me because i have made an argument a bit off the track, and now you are voting args upon someone who literally conceded?
Well it is not her profile picture, so we can never confirm that it is her.
If you click on Jasmine's link
You will see before and after
I think.
Nice.
Joe’s Hair
Jill asks me why I’m such a hairy guy,
I’m hairy night and day, enough for you to buy,
I’m hairy high and low; don’t ask; don’t know
Just stroke it smooth, t’will rise and show…
So, Darlin', give me head with hair,
Such long, beautiful hair,
Shining, gleaming, sniffing, flaxen, wax on,
Turn on, give me hair down to there
Hair that thrills when you stare,
Hair, baby, hair, momma, hair wherever,
Hair----
Show it, but don’t mow it, God, can I grow it!
Flies in the breeze, tangles in the trees,
Give a home to the fleas, a hive for the bees,
A nest for the birds, don’t they love my sniffing yours,
There ain’t no words for the wonders of coiffeurs,
Legs, hairy, pits, hairy, everywhere I’m hairy, Harry.
Hair…
©2019 by fauxlaw
[homage to the 60s Broadway hit, "Hair"]
It's an allegory about modern expectations.
What are you trying to make?
Alright, alright, this is truism, unless...??
I can handle a 1000 characters.
So can I interpret the resolution as “On balance, the user known as Jasmine, will cut her hair at least once in her life”?
Or you can change the resolution to "I chose to cut my hair" and change the word limit to 20 000 and you'll have an opponent.
define those terms intelligence_06 asked for. I'll be up for it
Define “I”, “cut”, and “hair”.
Change it to "I, with 100 percent certainty, cut my hair" and raise the word limit to 10 000 and you've got an opponent.