Instigator / Pro
18
1457
rating
4
debates
25.0%
won
Topic
#2741

I Cut My Hair

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
6
6
Better sources
6
0
Better legibility
3
2
Better conduct
3
2

After 3 votes and with 8 points ahead, the winner is...

Jasmine
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
1,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
10
1442
rating
22
debates
34.09%
won
Description

I: First person pronoun. I am referring to myself, and only me. This subject is about me.

Cut: Shorting of the hair.

Hair: Any of the fine threadlike strands growing from the skin of humans, mammals, and some other animals. (The hair that grows out of my scalp.)

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

I have very little idea what I genuinely just read.

I cannot grasp almost any of the poetry by Con but there is actual argumentation in it that at times is coherent:

"
I see you've cut your hair my dear

I can see your face from ear to ear.
"

Then there is sexual intonation to the waxing of stuff that I don't really want to go into. I literally don't understand this debate.

Con argued that Pro did cut her hair, Pro didn't argue and just gave proof that a woman she claims to be her has had her hair cut without even explaining what's inside the link.

What?

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Args: It is to Pro. Pro has essentially given a source which proves that she had cut her hair(To Con: You missed an opportunity in which since Pro had never used a photo for a profile before, it is essentially impossible to prove that the person that had her hair cut is Pro). Con ADMITS Pro has cut her hair in his poems, while making no arguments. A foregone conclusion and concession.

Sources: Pro used sources, Con didn't.

S&G: Both persons spelled correctly and everything is readable. Tie.

Conduct: Technically Con had went great lengths admitting that Pro has cut her hair and wrote poems unrelated to his standpoint. This shows that Con doesn't even care about winning this debate. To Pro.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

As this "debate" is a bit tongue-in-cheeky, I will offer first, in comments, my #10 as a thematic intercession of my composition. And now, the vote, just as cheeky, but with a bit of serious banter:

Argument: Sorry, Jasmine, but the creativity Zed displays is too good to be overwhelmed by a few words from you which were, after all, complementary to Zed. The poetry, Zed, as argument, is superb. points to Con.

Sourcing: Well, pro's sourcing was limited to to references to the same blog post, which did, I'll admit, graphically present the proof of the debate resolution: Jasmine did, indeed, cut her hair. As that was the point of Pro's argument, I'd have to say, in spite of Zed's clever use of sourcing material for his argument, a no-brainer. Pro wins these points.

S&G: a tie. Pro's graphics demonstrate as graphic grammar just as much left on the floor as Con's many strands of poetic grammar, and both spelled eloquently.

Conduct: A difficult choice. I, too, agreeing with Con, think pro's "before" was preferable to her "after," but I must admit bias toward more hair than less. However, Con's beginning stanza of R1 was a clever, if suggestive tilt toward "down there" a but further than pro's rebuttal suggests. Have to call this one a tie.

Conclusion: Zed wins by a hair.