Instigator / Pro
7
1674
rating
53
debates
67.92%
won
Topic

On Balance it Would be Beneficial to Society and Animals if no Personal Pet Ownership Existed

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
3
0
Sources points
2
0
Spelling and grammar points
1
1
Conduct points
1
0

With 1 vote and 6 points ahead, the winner is ...

Undefeatable
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Society
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One month
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Contender / Con
1
1601
rating
342
debates
65.5%
won
Description
~ 380 / 5,000

A much harder version of my pet ownership debate.

Personal pet ownership: adopted by an individual, rather than an organization, conservation, zoo, etc.

Burden of proof is shared. I will argue that if no individual ever owned pets, or can own pets, or will own pets, that it is still more beneficial than detrimental than our current world. For the sake of society and animals.

Added:
Instigator
--> @Ragnar

care for a vote?

Added:

Now? Or in a parallel universe?