Instigator / Pro
7
1644
rating
64
debates
65.63%
won
Topic
#2793

On Balance it Would be Beneficial to Society and Animals if no Personal Pet Ownership Existed

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
0
Better sources
2
0
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
0

After 1 vote and with 6 points ahead, the winner is...

Undefeatable
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
1
1687
rating
555
debates
68.11%
won
Description

A much harder version of my pet ownership debate.

Personal pet ownership: adopted by an individual, rather than an organization, conservation, zoo, etc.

Burden of proof is shared. I will argue that if no individual ever owned pets, or can own pets, or will own pets, that it is still more beneficial than detrimental than our current world. For the sake of society and animals.

-->
@Barney

care for a vote?

Now? Or in a parallel universe?