How to colonize our solar system
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 13 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- One day
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
We will debate the different ways to colonize our solar system.
My contender is not a Con we are debating different ways to do this.
Pro was the only side to meet the burden of proof. Con just agreed with Pro.
Neither side actively proved or explained itself but Pro actually met their burden of proof because Con explicitly agreed with them and then brought up a totally new point in the last Round via rhetorical question but new points in last Round are unfair especially when you're the final speaker of the whole debate. Also, Con agreed we should colonise the solar system, he only disagreed with a tiny bit about the order of doing it which he never remotely justified, at least Pro explained their idea fully.
While Pro brought up many arguments, Con only vaguely mentioned one and the debate was over by then. Pro wins arguments and conduct.
Pro offered a justification for their position regarding colonizing Venus for fuel. Con didn’t really present an argument of any substance, there was little justification given other than a throwaway statement about running out of resources. As a result, pro wins on arguments.
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Ramshutu // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 3 points to Pro for arguments
>Reason for Decision: Pro was the only side to meet the burden of proof. Con just agreed with Pro.
>Reason for Mod Action: The vote was found to be sufficient per the site voting policy standards.
************************************************************************
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Ramshutu // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 3 points to Pro for arguments
>Reason for Decision: Pro offered a justification for their position regarding colonizing Venus for fuel. Con didn’t really present an argument of any substance, there was little justification given other than a throwaway statement about running out of resources. As a result, pro wins on arguments.
>Reason for Mod Action: The vote was found to be sufficient per the site voting policy standards.
************************************************************************
If you want to debate about space, then have the debate title be, "The moon should be colonized before Mars".
Now that I do, I won’t do so bad in the next debate
Just letting you guys know that this is my first debate. I really have no idea what I’m doing.