Instigator / Con
1
1474
rating
4
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#2828

The government should subsidise tourism in regional areas.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
0
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
0
1

After 1 vote and with 6 points ahead, the winner is...

Intelligence_06
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
7
1731
rating
167
debates
73.05%
won
Description

I will waive the first round. BoP is shared.

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro does a very straight forward benefit analysis including creating stable jobs, and pulling in foreign money. Con counters with a weak whataboutism that healthcare would also be good to subsidise... Nothing about this implies they are mutually exclusive. As pro points out, his actual argument went unopposed.

Sources:
This is a no brainer. Con offers a single one showing that yes, medicine is a business. Pro uses numerous courses showing the benefits of tourism, and people being fine with taxes.

Conduct:
Forfeiture.