Instigator / Pro
20
1502
rating
40
debates
36.25%
won
Topic
#2856

Undefeatable is not a Good Debater

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
21
Better sources
8
14
Better legibility
6
7
Better conduct
6
4

After 7 votes and with 26 points ahead, the winner is...

Intelligence_06
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
46
1731
rating
167
debates
73.05%
won
Description

I asked Und the other day why he was losing so many debates. He admitted he thought he wasn't a good debater at heart, but didn't want to put another debate with his username on the line. He explained his reasoning to me. I asked him if I could create a debate about it, and he said sure.

Poor quality: Inferior or mediocre in quality

Debater: a person who argues about a subject, especially in a formal manner.

Good debater qualities: The desirable qualities of a good debater include the ability to speak clearly, think quickly, clarify arguments, provide examples, maintain persuasive speech, and maintain a professional tone and body language. In addition, a good debater should be knowledgeable about the subject area and construct arguments that will persuade the target audience.

Source: https://www.reference.com/world-view/qualities-good-debater-49b034f90686276e

-->
@gugigor

Kritiks that can make you win this debate:
1: Argue that "is" stands for the present tense, hence past debates matters nothing(especially if presentism is possible to be justified); then say that I am able to destroy his argument put ready for this debate, hence he isn't great
2: Argue that since all traits are needed, and it is impossible to say if Undefeatable is able to utilize body language, thus it is impossible to say that Undefeatable is a good debater
3: Argue, definition-wise, that Undefeatable and Good Debater means different things, and the two doesn't necessarily mean the same thing so that the use of "is" could be validated

-->
@gugigor

Kinda ironic that he's winning the flat earth debate, eh?

I will likely vote on this debate, as I have had three debates with Undefeatable, with results in a dead heat: 1 win, 1 loss, and a tie. Two of the three were on the same subject, resulting in a win and a tie. So, what's my assessment? Well, since I intend to vote, and since our results are so evenly distributed, I reserve judgment to be based entirely on the debate results, and not by personal experience, which is not a valid vote consequence anyway. Good luck to both, and to the subject of the debate.

sorry, i meant that flat earth theory is just as detached as Qanon. automatic brain be like

If the reason is the same reason, then I must be terrible.

-->
@MisterChris

tbh, I kind of wanted to create this resolution as a criticism exchange, but I didn't want to risk losing again so I gave gugigor free terms to throw this out

-->
@gugigor
@Undefeatable

This is aimed at you, Undefeatable. You can have it removed if you wish.

Gugigor, future reference, just don't....

-->
@gugigor

He is actually a good debater, he is Undefeatable.

Personal attack

-->
@gugigor

I would accept the debate, but I am currently too busy