Instigator / Pro
4
1395
rating
12
debates
4.17%
won
Topic
#2863

The three cubed canon, and how the solar system is designed. There are no accidents.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

Benjamin
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,080
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
7
1777
rating
79
debates
76.58%
won
Description

How it is designed to be.

-->
@Undefeatable

thank you for the vote

If a three-cubed canon is supposed to define the solar system design, why is it that the theory works only with the Sun, Earth, and Moon? There are other elements to the solar system [other planets, and their moons, plus an asteroid belt, comets, etc]. Why don't these other elements fit the paradigm?

The same interrupt of logic applies t the squared circle, for which other planets and their moons do not have the same ratio of size as Earth/Moon.

A far better design theory is the prevailing use of the golden ratio: 1:1.618, as demonstrated by Fra Luca de Pacioli, friend of Leo Da Vinci.

What

-->
@Sum1hugme

"Sure sounds like numerology"

No, numerology is assigning meanings to numbers, and I am not doing that in this case(although I do do it in other circumstances) There is also the gematria aspect, which I do not do, which is assigning numbers to letters and creating meanings for the results. I have dabbled in gematria for a small extent, but I have never gotten into it much, it doesn't really interest me.

-->
@janesix

Sure sounds like numerology

-->
@Sum1hugme

"Numerology is a long, complicated road to nowhere."

It's not numerology.

-->
@janesix

Numerology is a long, complicated road to nowhere.

-->
@Sum1hugme

My argument is that the solar system is designed according to specific numbers, basically, multiples of three cubed, and others that tie in with those

-->
@janesix

What is this argument about? I read your opening but I'm just more confused about what you're arguing for