Instigator / Con
11
1516
rating
1
debates
100.0%
won
Topic
#2910

Single-sex schools are better for student learning and mental health

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
6
3
Better sources
2
4
Better legibility
1
2
Better conduct
2
0

After 2 votes and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...

M.Sharafaldin
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
2
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
9
1484
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro FF post-R1

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Understand that I am being intentionally lax in point allocation, to help guide these new debaters in how to seek such points.

Arguments go to con:
He has the asserted positive point of social benefits, and more importantly he counters pro's only point by suggesting expulsion of sexual predators.
Pro whereas just has that sexual harassment occurs, but did not defend his point when it was challenged by a counter plan (a good defense would have been that the explosions fail to occur in the real world).

Sources go to pro:
Pro well utilized both newspapers and peer reviewed study, to well support his case in favor of single sex schools. The evidence was powerful, and had he not forfeited half the debate it no doubt would have bolstered arguments enough to secure a victory.

Legibility to pro:
While everything was readable, con set an entire one of his rounds in bold; harming his side.

Conduct to con:
Pro missed a round, which came to half the debate. This also impacted arguments, due to the dropped case.