Instigator / Pro
4
1350
rating
29
debates
20.69%
won
Topic
#2932

It's Proven True: White Americans Are Domestic Terrorists: Prove Me Wrong

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
12
Better sources
0
8
Better legibility
3
4
Better conduct
1
4

After 4 votes and with 24 points ahead, the winner is...

Barney
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
8,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
28
1810
rating
49
debates
100.0%
won
Description

As the title states, White Americans are proven yet again that they are America's true terrorists. This time around, Atlanta is ground zero with yet another mass shooting that was perpetrated by nonother than a white person. I've debated this topic on numerous occasions and have easily won with simple facts. White-Domestic Terrorism has dated back to the colonization of this land. The main question is, "why are white people so violent and criminal-minded?" Facts and history proves that there's something quite "off" about these people thanks to their pathology. When looking at all of the different races in the US, white Americans are ranked #1 in every crime category. When looking at the last few terroristic acts, white Americans have perpetrated the crimes. Government institutions have also labelled white Americans as domestic terrorists. If anyone has the knowledge, facts and evidence to prove me wrong, then you can accept this challenge of clearing white Americas domestic-terrorism tag.

Good Luck

-->
@mairj23

I would suggest use hyperlinkable sources in your arguments.

-->
@RationalMadman

To me this was not a real debate, and the vote in question had no chance of changing the outcome; therefore I did opt to waste anyone's time with a report.

-->
@blamonkey
@MisterChris

Benjamin's vote is a votebomb. There is no way that you can say it's 'obvious', it's a votebomb and Ragnar didn't report it to you because he is intending to win this debate.

-->
@mairj23

Good luck in your pursuit of higher education. It is a noble goal.

-->
@fauxlaw

You brought up BLM, the 1619 Project & Native Americans, not me...Your Ph.D in whatever is fine, but I have a BA in Forensic Anthropology, will soon have a Master's if everything goes as planned, have seen/studied skeletal remains of indigenous people and have written/published multiple reports on the topic to prove that many of the so-called Natives of today are not indigenous at all. I'm well aware of who is who and what is what.......

but none of this has nothing to do with the fact that white Americans are labelled as domestic terrorists.

-->
@fauxlaw

Fair enough

-->
@Theweakeredge

Strictly speaking, yes, community service does not, in solid, though debatable terms, fit the legal description of indentured servitude, let alone slavery, but I wager Pro is unaware of the specific distinctions, though Pro may now look it it up in attempt to "chattal." No need; the debate is done and in the books. The time for that proof has passed without having made the effort when it counted.

-->
@fauxlaw

There is still debate over if that actually fits into the nature of slavery - though I suppose the rebuttal to that is that it doesn't fit into the nature of chattel slavery, not slavery in general.

-->
@mairj23

"...if you knew anything about real history"
IF? I happen to have a PhD on the subject. Yes, some Native Americans were also slave owners. And?
And I know a good deal about constitutional law, such as that today, slavery, by strict definition, still exists as punishment for a specified duration for certain crimes. We've just changed the nomenclature: we call it "community service."

-->
@Our_Boat_is_Right

Exposing & Hating are 2 different things.

Lighten up, it's only playful banter

You know your a pretty immature loser when you use hashtags on a debate site while seemingly simultaneously taking the position of all 4 political quadrants in the comment section despite openly admitting to hating white people.

#JustSaying
#StepYourGameUp

-->
@mairj23

I am apart of the LGBTIA+ and I have no idea what you're talking about. Do you think that intersex and asexual people don't exist? Because centuries of psychological research would testify to how wrong you are there bud.

-->
@Theweakeredge

Well, you did die for our sins!

-->
@Theweakeredge

If I offended your sexually then I apologize, but everyone knows that a lot of nonsense is being promoted through LGBT+. A lot of nonsense is promoted through BLM and a lot of nonsense is promoted through these white militias that's causing chaos.

So now an "IA" has been added to LGBTQ?... but that's the nonsense that I'm talking about.

-->
@Barney

Wouldn't that make me Jesus? You know - taking things to their conclusion and all

-->
@Theweakeredge

Taking certain comments to their logical conclusion, apparently your parents are God...

-->
@mairj23

You've made several claims without actual evidence - furthermore - you've at the very least revealed yourself to be biased against LBTQIA+, which I am one of, furthermore, perhaps a slight xenophobia? Throwing in a "you wouldn't be here if god didn't make you" argument and you have yourself a classic example of someone with exactly zero credibility for their arguments.

-->
@Theweakeredge

I'm Black & don't support BLM because it was co-opted & has become a fraud which serves LGBT nonsense & illegal immigration.
I've destroyed the Atheist concept multiple times...if you don't believe in a higher power then that's on you, but your a** wouldn't be debating me right now if (something) didn't create you.

#StepYourGameUp

-->
@fauxlaw

And if you knew anything about real history then you'd already know that Indians were slave owners themselves which destroys your argument.

-->
@mairj23

You are as ignorant as you are unsbustantive.

I'm an atheist and an anti-theist. Please do the basic modicum of research before you make a claim about me bud. The bible is making a fallacy the "nation" is making a fallacy. If you read my profile, and my arguments, you'd also know that I support BLM and police abolition. I find your "boxing" to be unintentionally hilarious and very anger-inducing. A couple of examples DOES not demonstrate the entire guilt of a demographic of people. Let's say that 10 cats had killed a human, does that mean that all cats are dangerous to humans? No, of course not.

"we all as a people get judged by the individual acts of a view" Is bullshit and utter crap, its some of the most flawed arguments I've heard in a while

-->
@mairj23

since when is religion a racial profile? Was slavery a racial profile? It was not, by the way, though BLM, nor 1619 Project will never admit that. They both ignorer that Native Americans were taken into slavery from the 17th century, as well. Can't paint history with your singular brush, no matter how wide it is.

-->
@Theweakeredge

One example??? Your very own Christian Bible says "people are judged as a nation." The term nation refers to ethnic group, not a country. It's not arbitrary. If one group of people has a documented history of kindness then that ethnic group will be labelled as such. Since white Americans have committed the last 5 or 6 domestic terror acts in the US, then that's why you're the face of domestic terrorism. Case in Point: Three random videos of a black person fighting an Asian person and all of a sudden, it's being reported as black (people) vs Asians. The media is blaming black people "as a nation" for 3 random attacks. So, what I'm saying is that we all as a people get judged by the individual acts of a few.

-->
@fauxlaw

His religion/spiritual belief doesn't negate the fact that he's a white male. Two terror attacks within a week proves my point perfectly.

Let's not forget the fact that another white domestic-terrorist was caught with a rifle outside of Vice President K. Harris' home a few days ago.

-->
@mairj23

You need to learn something - one example of something happening is not enough to demonstrate that an entire demographic follow similarly, furthermore, what are you defining as white here? How do you define "white" people - science finds that people are more different among their own skin color than compared to others, furthermore, white people can have black parents, or Mexican parents, would you still consider them white because their pigment of skin was white? I mean, why should you, you don't consider people like Obama, who had one black parent and one white parent, white, even though in the case of someone having a Mexican parent and black parent could be either. Whats my point, the entire thing is arbitrary, the only reason why it matters is because of the cultural impact the oppression of one race has undergone (the oppression of the black citizen) and the privilege of the white citizen - however - to declare either group wholly terorists would require: A) comprehensive evidence that EVERY SINGLE or MOST people of that demographic were terrorists, OR B) Demonstrate that some cultural impact makes ALL people of that demographic de facto terrorists - problem with that one - there are SEVERAL different cultures among each "race" intertwined to make one general one.

Regarding the recent Muslim mass murderer, that would of course not be enough evidence to proclaim Muslims are in general murderers, let alone terrorists.

-->
@mairj23

Yeah? "Another white-domestic terrorist" who is named Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa? That may just be a huge coincidence by some Bob and Mary Jones out of Colorado Springs, who just happened to pick a non-white name for their 21-year-old son radicalized by ice cream and cake. But I doubt it. Try to keep up, my friend. "Right" is not what you are, neither in real time or space time, or even basil and thyme. A few examples picked out of a crowd, including this one, do not make a case. And this one clearly does not even fit your crowd pattern.

By the way, your "easily won" debates are actually all losers, so, perhaps your inbox messages are not as broadly observant as they should be. The same logic appears to escape your results in the last five debates as in this one. Dyslexia? Myopia? No diagnosis?

-->
@Theweakeredge

Why am I right? Just turn on your HDTV and you'll see that another white-domestic terrorist has killed 10 people in a da** supermarket.
My point is proven in "real time."

-->
@fauxlaw

Thank you so much for the incredibly detailed vote. It was more than this debate deserved!

-->
@mairj23

Suuure... and why do we care if some anonymous people said you're right? Please demonstrate why YOU are correct.

-->
@Intelligence_06

Really? Here are a few quotes from my inbox. "Your arguments are controversial, but you're correct."..."Everyone's aware of the truth but we won't admit it."..."Truth tellers are often viewed as crazy."..."I'd vote for you but I'd lose friends here."..."I respect your debates. Unfortunately, white people are on code."

I'm well aware of the politics that goes on.

Extend the argument time to 1 week.

No, actually don't, if you are afraid of losing. If you still think you are undefeatable on this topic even after over 3 losses at my own witness, then go ahead. You can delete this if you want, it is nearly impossible to even prove this.