Instigator / Pro
49
1516
rating
1
debates
100.0%
won
Topic

CAM or LILY

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
21
15
Sources points
14
14
Spelling and grammar points
7
6
Conduct points
7
7

With 7 votes and 7 points ahead, the winner is ...

luke
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Miscellaneous
Time for argument
Two days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One month
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Contender / Con
42
1484
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Description
~ 0 / 5,000

No information

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Con said, "I don't know Cam well enough to choose".

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Both arguments were not fulfilling their respective BOP. Tied.

Equal forfeiture and no sources.

The only thing is that Pro is more formal in word usage, a desirable attribute. 1 more point for Pro.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Neither of the args given by either side were supported or opposed the res.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Nothing was achieved. .

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Neither established that one was better than the other, though Con did present a semi-kritque before giving it up. Neither presented a second argument and thus - I rule them equal... as Pro essentially concedes that both are the same, and Con questions his own resolution. So tie.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Argument - Con makes a couple of statements: "They are HUMAN. Not objects from a menu.". Nowhere did Pro state they were not human, nor suggest they are objects from a menu and probably does not require enlightening to this fact, and so not a very good argument. Secondly, Con makes an admission: "I don't know Cam well enough to choose". Con has just admitted that Con does not know enough about the subject to debate, and therefore this makes Pros opening statement the more reliable of the two. "I think that they are equally good, they are in ap classes so they are smart and they are personable people.". - Pro

Sources - Neither produce sources - Tie

S&G - Pro remains professional regarding grammar, whilst Con decides that but is spelt buttttttttt, though I realise this is deliberate and so will resist awarding a violation - Tie

Conduct - Both forfeit, so one violation each - Tie

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Both conceded that the characters are equally good then forfeited all Rounds after Round 1