Instigator / Pro
6
1644
rating
64
debates
65.63%
won
Topic
#3069

THBT ONB We Should Abolish Euro Currency

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
3
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
0
1

After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

Sum1hugme
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
12,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
7
1627
rating
37
debates
66.22%
won
Description

This house believes that, On net balance, The Euro should be Retired/Abolished

Burden of proof is shared

We: Society/Law/Government (whoever controls Euro currency)

Should: The beneficial action to take, under net balance restrictions

Con: We should keep the Euro

Euro: the single European currency, which replaced the national currencies of France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Greece, Portugal, Luxembourg, Austria, Finland, the Republic of Ireland, Belgium, and the Netherlands in 2002. Nineteen member states of the European Union now use the euro.

Abolish: to get rid of, to stop using

Anyone else want to vote?

-->
@Barney

Thank you for voting

-->
@Sum1hugme
@Undefeatable

**************************************************
>Reported Vote: Ragnar // Mod action: Not Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: Conduct to con.
>Reason for Decision: See Votes Tab.
>Reason for Mod Action:

Someone seriously reported this? Wow!
I'm not going to bother asking MisterChris to fairly and impartially review the vote, as there's nothing subjective about the vote point allocation to be contested.

From the voting policy:
"The disrespect of even a single forfeiture necessitates this penalty unless there is reason to withhold it. Repeated forfeitures are grounds for casting conduct only votes without any consideration to arguments (continued in Forfeitures)."
https://info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy#conduct
**************************************************

-->
@Barney

Please consider voting

Vote bump

vote bump

Vote bump

Vote bump

Vote bump

Vote bump

Vote bump

-->
@whiteflame
@oromagi
@MisterChris

You guys like politics. Please consider voting on this as a two round debate.

Vote bump

Vote bump

Vote bump

Vote bump

Vote bump

Vote bump

vote bump

Vote bump

Vote bump

Vote bump

-->
@Intelligence_06

But I get what you're saying.

-->
@Intelligence_06

Bc just because this house believes something doesn't mean it's true

This house believes that?

It becomes a truism. I could literally just argue how Pro's argument supports Pro's ideology and why Pro believes that. Why is this expression even an expression used in debates?

Vote bump

Vote bump

-->
@TheUnderdog

Thank you for voting, but I think Undefeatable and I would both like some analysis of the arguments.

-->
@Undefeatable

It happens man

-->
@Sum1hugme

sorry. Got absorbed in my job and ran out of time. :(

-->
@RationalMadman

We: Society

Should: The beneficial action to take, under net balance restrictions

-->
@Undefeatable

define 'we' and 'should' and I will probably take it. Also 15k chars or nearer to that than 5k

-->
@Undefeatable

I agree with the topic

-->
@RationalMadman

fine, LOL

-->
@Undefeatable

Not only are you being a coward about this but you're also insulting everyone you haven't ruled out. I don't know why you keep doing that but I find it very immature.

-->
@RationalMadman

they are probably above my fighting skills.

-->
@Undefeatable

I know scant little about this.

Why can't fourtrouble and blamonkey accept the debate

-->
@Undefeatable

I have... ideas(?) about this - but I've never actually debated about currency itself.

-->
@RationalMadman
@whiteflame
@Intelligence_06
@Theweakeredge

feel free to think it over.