Was it justified for USA to drop the atomic bombs on Japan?

I as a judge will not vote on definition abuse.

I think it's pretty clear that they're affirming the res

You can define all terms to all crazy extents. Terms are just squiggles on a screen. If they don't define you can do it yourself.

In concurrence with fauxlaw, there isn't enough information. What's your definition of 'justified'? What requirements are there to consider a decision to be justified? I would love to accept this debate if you could give that info!

Given the format of the Resolution as a question, you need to identify your position; was it justified, or not. It is not at all clear just because you have initiated and challenged the debate. A no-infomation Description is not sufficient when a Resolution is offered as a question.

This is for you.