Instigator / Pro
4
1469
rating
10
debates
40.0%
won
Topic
#3225

Establishing restrictions on the use of antibiotics for medical use. (whiteflame requested and accepted)

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
12
Better sources
2
8
Better legibility
1
4
Better conduct
1
4

After 4 votes and with 24 points ahead, the winner is...

RationalMadman
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
28
1697
rating
556
debates
68.17%
won
Description

Opponent must present a topic and framework in the chat. I will agree with a specific resolution and debate that topic.

ONLY RULE IS NO TROLLISH TOPICS.

Any suggested changes to the debate will be implemented.

(This debate is a copy, because I want to debate an active person.)

-->
@RationalMadman

This debate won't matter anyway. The mods won't let me on the site until I'm 13. Ragnar DM'ed me

-->
@DeadFire27

The accepted part

-->
@RationalMadman

What part of whiteflame requested and accepted did you not understand?!

-->
@whiteflame

Agreed.

-->
@DeadFire27

It'll have to wait a bit, likely won't be able to start this until the weekend, so I'll accept a little before then.

In the meantime, I would like to clarify what definitions we are using.

My use of the words "Establishing restrictions" implies the government actively imposing limitations on antibiotic usage. Are we agreed on that?

-->
@whiteflame

I'm willing to accept Establishing restrictions on the use of antibiotics for medical use as PRO. Accept it when ready.

-->
@DeadFire27

I'd be up for variations on any of the following:

Establishing restrictions on the use of antibiotics for medical use (either side)
Environmental movements should support climate engineering that fundamentally alters the environment in an attempt to combat global warming (Con)
Government agencies that regulate drugs should only test whether a drug is safe, not whether it is effective, before approving it for public use (Con)

-->
@DeadFire27

I'm interested in what you think of my plan to get the US out of debt:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13C09M6rSyjeQKNWXh_hG-9MreNwat2vEZVfO4E1zZKY/edit#gid=592285639

-->
@drlebronski

Eh, been done a lot.

THBT: the benefits of gun control outweigh the harms

(im not interested in debating just thought id throw out some suggestions)