There is only one objective Truth
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 5 votes and with 32 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Truth: Any and all facts that accurately reflect reality rather than fiction or misinformation (which are unaffected by beliefs except upon a meta-level).
Kritiks of definitions is totally acceptable in philosophical debates.
I am Pro
- Binary is an existing method of organizing data
- It is possible that there is/will be useful applications for Binary(For example, Computers)
- Any natural number could be represented by Binary
- Binary(base two) is not the same as hexadecimal(base sixteen)
- Binary is the same as Binary
- A digit containing the quantity of one more than the quantity of one(aka, two) is not used to represent data in the Binary system
"Binary is an existing and working method of organizing quantitative data".
4B: utilizing two harmless ingredients that upon combining form a lethal substance (such as a gas)[1]
- Since objectively-correct statements can be derived from other objectively-true statements, and specifically the one regarding Binary can be derived of 6 or more objective statements, it means that there is not "only one" objectively correct statement, but 6 or more.
- Mathematical and logical structures that requires no empirical proof are objective, and statements such as "a number is equal to itself" is also objectively true.
- Semantically, All words can defined arbitrarily to whatever we want, making so that Pro has no sufficient proof of anything being objectively true.
Full forfeit by Pro
But, also, Con had the more insightful argument due simply to Pro's lack of sufficient defining of his terms, leaving Con, and me as a judge, believing that Pro's argument was that there is but one objective truth [and the definition of "objective" didn't sell well to avoid Pro's view of the topic. pro very successfully refuted the argument. Neither had sufficient sources to sway judgment toward either opponent.
Con wins
ffffffffffffffff
slamdunk..........
Full forfeit
Yours.