Instigator / Pro
0
1516
rating
2
debates
75.0%
won
Topic
#3246

A computer Will be Never Able to Replicate the Human Mind Perfectly

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
0
Better sources
0
0
Better legibility
0
0
Better conduct
0
0

After not so many votes...

It's a tie!
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two months
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
0
1493
rating
6
debates
16.67%
won
Description

I'm back one the cite!
I will support that a computer will never be able to replicate the human mind (including the human experience of pain, emotions etc…) (i am PRO)
My opponent will support A computer will be able to replicate the human mind perfectly (given some sort of future technology) (My opponent is CON)

No trolling
No solphism
Definitions are not to be changed after you accept the debate (but they can be before you accept)

Human mind = a mind of a human being, in its entirety, and all functions of the brain (including feeling emotions and pain)
Replicate = make an exact copy of; reproduce
Computer = an electronic device for storing and processing data.

You can dispute these definitions before the debate

-->
@Intelligence_06

I guess it really doesn't have to be perfectly, the computer just needs to be able to think, and see color, and feel emotions. Without getting into the debate too much, I would say there's a difference between mimicking and replicating emotions

-->
@Intelligence_06

people need to start both arguing for the win if the debate is abusive and set up that way and voting to award the win to players who fight against abusive terms that make a debate one sided

-->
@Wylted

One valid interpretation of the term can possibly lead to a determined loss and we have nothing to do.

Why do you guys nitpick over his terms. Just sort it out in the debate

-->
@The_Meliorist

What criteria must be filled in order to count as "perfectly"? I suppose, if you don't give this, it would become a truism as the idea of "cannot be better" is arbitrary and not linked to measurable data unless specified.

-->
@Ramshutu

by "perfectly" I mean in a manner that cannot be done better
by "replicate" I mean a computer can do all things a human brain can do, which is feel, think etc...

-->
@The_Meliorist

What’s the definition of “perfectly”?

In addition: by “replicate”: do you mean simulate/emulate (it could be taken to mean replicate as in to create a copy of - like 3d printing)