Instigator / Pro
0
1493
rating
5
debates
20.0%
won
Topic

communism works.

Status
Voting

Participant that receives the most points from the judges is declared a winner.

The voting will end in:

00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Economics
Time for argument
Two weeks
Voting system
Judicial decision
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Winner selection
Rating mode
Unrated
Characters per argument
10,000
Judges
Contender / Con
0
1663
rating
370
debates
65.68%
won
Description
~ 260 / 5,000

definitions:
communism:
possession of the means of production by workers.
works: does not generate economic decrease.
rules:
1. stick to the definitions.
2. The burden of proof is shared.
3. Any violation of the above rules means losing the debate immediately.

Added:
--> @RationalMadman

they had a way of circumventing (via the phone password), and in fact, they may be using my social networks right now.

Added:
Contender
--> @loco

the thief has access to your gmail account? They knew the passcode or had a way to bypass it?

That is SERIOUS, it is worse than them just selling it for parts or resetting the phone to use it.

Added:
--> @RationalMadman

It would be possible if the thief in question had not deleted my account (I use gmail for this site).

Added:
Contender
--> @loco

While that is terrible, you can try and access the email elsewhere.

Sorry to hear it, hopefully you can afford one soon,

Added:
--> @RationalMadman

my cell phone was stolen, so I lost my original account, and I can no longer debate.

Added:
Contender
--> @gugigor @elhombremasinteligente

"If 'works' means that the workers seizing the means of production leads to the economic power of the nation reducing, this happens each and every time."

I MADE A MISTAKE IT IS OBVIOUS PLEASE

I meant to say that if 'doesn't work' means that... I'll explain in next round...

Please, it's really obvious I meant the opposite to what I said when saying 'this happens each and every time.' I didn't mean that it works every time, I meant the literal opposite, I apologise for my miswording.

Added:
Instigator
--> @RationalMadman

I have finished the debate against bones, go choose the winner.

Added:
Instigator
--> @Intelligence_06

what generated decline in that case was the war, not the economic system.

Added:

"works: does not generate economic decrease."

The Soviets, in the 20's, still had economic decrease due to war, despite prospering to a degree. There is no system that does not generate decrease.
There is no system that never generates decrease. If it is one, then it means it has never been used ever.

Added:
Instigator
--> @gugigor

I think you will be impartial.

Added:
Judge

why am I the judge lol