Instigator / Pro
4
1515
rating
7
debates
50.0%
won
Topic
#3347

Invent a Religion

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
4
0

After 4 votes and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...

Swagnarok
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
0
1456
rating
6
debates
16.67%
won
Description

Voters are to use the following criterion to inform their final decision:

1. Credibility
Or that is, the claims of the religion are generally believable for a given time and place.

2. Historical Credibility
Or that is, this religion's development was believably the product of a certain time and place, both of its material conditions and of its prevailing mindsets and ideas.

3. Internal Coherency
Or that is, its own logic and precepts do not contradict themselves.

4. Detail & Imaginativeness
No explanation needed.

-->
@Novice

He tried to dox someone.
https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/3024-public-moderation-log?page=2&post_number=42

-->
@Barney

Why did you ban him?

Note: This debate concluded before the ban.

Good.

Since you're back, I hope you'll do something for Round 4. Suffice to say there's no more chance to critique each other, but you can still put in a 10,000 character something to match and contrast with mine.

Thank you for extending

-->
@Swagnarok

He's been offline for 10 days, don't think he's coming back. Wouldn't bother posting anything anymore, you're going to win off of conduct anyway.

Hey.
Man. At the time that I'm writing this, it's not too late. Just submit something for Round 3 that's condensed enough to fit in 10,000 characters and then we can spent Round 4 critiquing each other's prompts.
If you're still active on DART, please respond to this message.

To me, 'religion' is a matter of con artistry, lazy thinking and fairytale telling.

Actual theology is linked to philosophy and quantum physics and goes far deeper than some nice story.

-->
@Incel-chud

I didn't really describe my religious outlook in that 'invent a religion' debate I had. I just went for some seemingly good storyline of reality that's catchy and avoided any direct plagiarism of polytheistic religions.

Ramshutu was the only voter, that secured my defeat tbh.

Hey,

Take this as a reminder you have about one day left to post. That's still plenty of time, I just wanted to make sure you don't forget about this debate.

-->
@Swagnarok

I don't have a main drafte. I have hundreds of pieces of papers I have scribbled notes on when in hypermanic states that I am trying to make sense of and put in this debate

-->
@Incel-chud

If you're going with your main draft then so will I. Let's make this one to remember.

-->
@Swagnarok

I am unlikely to win, because I am doing a combination of those things. I have been working on an ideal for a while, and have secretly written about 500 pages on it, and it is quite muddled and I am trying to make sense of it now. I am honestly more interested in honing my ideal here, than I am in winning. I think RM has some great ideals and would like to see the winner replicate this debate with him, if he is willing

I pretty much have two options here:

First, I can unload my big personal project onto this. It'll certainly be detailed. But there are some problems with that which I don't really want to go into, such as its dramatic length or diminished ability to use this concept elsewhere.

Second, I can make up something on the fly. I'm capable of doing this, but it won't be as impressive and Con might credibly win.

This should be fun to watch.