Instigator / Con
1
1483
rating
327
debates
40.21%
won
Topic
#3460

Gun control

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
1
1

After 1 vote and with the same amount of points on both sides...

It's a tie!
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
1
1455
rating
3
debates
16.67%
won
Description

I was requested by the contender to post this debate.
I don't know exactly where they stand on this topic so I can't form any direct specific detailed arguments.
I can try to play oppositional advocate as best as it matches to my true position.
In the end , there may or may not be much to agree or disagree with.

-->
@zedvictor4

Even if one side barely contributes, you still have to at least point to an argument the other side made that upheld their position. It’s not automatic that a contribution is pertinent.

-->
@whiteflame

Votes requested.

Con provides absolutely nothing of substance and Pro provides 3 rounds of relative substance.....It's a no brainer, as well you know.

Someone whinges and the vote get's removed.

Is it any wonder that no one bothers to vote.

D******D

-->
@zedvictor4
@Mall
@jamezrevenge

**************************************************
>Reported Vote: zedvictor4 // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 1 to Pro
>Reason for Decision:

#1. Instigator Con doesn't seem to know what's what, so should have declined contender Pro's request.

#3. Con gives us a brief intro into life on the streets.

#5 Con unwisely rests upon the strength of #3.

#2.4.6. Pro, at least provides 3 rounds of relative substance, emotion and thoughtfulness. Thereby they should be acknowledged for their effort.

>Reason for Mod Action:
The voter must address specific points made by both sides in the debate and consider how they function with the resolution. The voter is kind of specific about what Con said in R2, but doesn't consider specific points made by Pro, nor does he consider how any of these points impact under the resolution. Acknowledging effort is nice, but not sufficient.

-->
@zedvictor4

impressively diplomatic

-->
@Conservallectual

why do you hope i win?

-->
@jamezrevenge

I hope you win

-->
@Mall

i was just wanting to do a debate on gun control and I want people to have a background check before they even set there hands on a gun