Instigator / Con
6
1465
rating
10
debates
25.0%
won
Topic
#3605

Should homework be banned?

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
0
Better sources
2
0
Better legibility
0
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...

zing_book
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
2
Time for argument
Twelve hours
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
2
1480
rating
2
debates
0.0%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Abhaysingh puts forth a few argument criticizing the present state of homeworks in India as he is a student. The thing is: He never argued against the entirety, the construct, the concept of homeworks, he just argued against the present execution. Not only that, he says in many places that "homework should..." and similar phrases, which suggests that homeworks are argued to be something that can be improved if not abolished. Abhaysingh's argument was indeed well-constructed (and much easier to read), it just didn't do what it is meant to do: prove that homeworks should be abolished.

Zing_book on the other hand, picks up these flaws in the argument and points out that Pro's suggestions can indeed be used as improvements to the concept of homeworks. He gives constructive arguments based on common sense and collection of sources(such as Youtube and BBC), such as it improves time management skills, presentation skills, etc; and points out that conditions Pro has mentioned is specific to India and could be different in other places and time. Pro never proved that India is a good set to consider the topic which likely encompasses much wider. Con states this and renders Pro's prior arguments defenseless.

Not only that, Abhaysingh only uses empirical/anectodal evidence to prove his point, while only using an Indian TV source without saying why it is bad(at least the source didn't say, and the weigh it brings isn't a lot because it is a subpoint to a not-well-rounded argument). On the other hand, Pro uses many sources such as BBC and Youtube, which is not much, but more than Pro's efforts.

Pro's arguments were VERY legible and clear, whereas Con's is a bit harder to decipher for not separating paragraphs, missing punctuations at some locations, and some grammar issues such as "There are other downsides of homework are apparent to everyone".

Both parties forfeited one round while behaving fairly civil in the rounds they did not forfeit.

Verdict: Args and Sources to Con, S&G to Pro, Conduct ties. Con wins in my opinion.