The senses are unreliable
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 8 votes and with 35 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 15,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Not really much to say, we don't do rules. Just stay on topic.
Con stayed relevant to the topic while Pro did THAT...
FFFooooooooorrrrrrrrrrffffffffffeeeeeeeiiiiiiiiiiittttttttttttttuuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee................................
CON stayed on topic and did not forfeit
No reasonable arugument from Pro.
ehyeh is going to hell advocating sexual attraction as opposed to selebicy.
CON stayed on topic and did not forfeit.
Pro made no point while Con pointed out that Pro made no point. Also, forfeiture is forfeiture.
The word "forfeiture" or "forfeit" is being used way too often on this site, that said.
Pro trills entire debate, Con at leasts asks relevant questions.
Presumption goes neg. I really do not see the point that pro was trying to make. There are progressive styles of debate, but even with this, one must link into the resolution and provide some level of analysis. This simply is not given here. Really this round just feels more like Pro was trolling, and this along with the FF also merits a conduct point.
Well yes, I suppose I agree that nothing may have tested you, but it seems better to simply win the debate; you probably only needed one syllogism, and Mall would likely just ignore it and repeat the same thing for the rest of the debate, allowing you to use minimal effort.
That's why I forfeited. I lose interest in a discussion fast if I don't think anything of value will be produced from it (such as my ideas being questioned) mall would just ask me questions instead.
You are well read on philosophical matters, and you are matched up against someone who is quite probably the worst debater on this site who knows extremely little about this topic. You should have won this debate effortlessly, I guess I struggle to understand why you would throw this one away.
Idk but later I'm in school
...
What do you want to debate about?
debate sometime?
Pokémon is for geeks. Are you calling Andrew Top G Tate a geek?
sir emory tate will beat the devil to a pulp and use the pokemon move "wife steal" to steal satans hoes.
your 100 fold repetition of the word "baby" is also insanity - are you corrupted by satan?
I guess ill see Andrew Tate there.
One kiss is all it takes
this is the road to the devil and satan inshallah
Where did I say that?
A display of poetry.
What was this?
I think I'm not even going to make an argument in this debate. I think it's a bit unfair. The debate is too easy. I'm not sure what I was expecting, the senses clearly have limitations.