Instigator / Pro
21
1487
rating
31
debates
35.48%
won
Topic
#3613

The senses are unreliable

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
24
Better sources
12
16
Better legibility
6
8
Better conduct
0
8

After 8 votes and with 35 points ahead, the winner is...

Mall
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
15,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
56
1483
rating
327
debates
40.21%
won
Description

Not really much to say, we don't do rules. Just stay on topic.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Con stayed relevant to the topic while Pro did THAT...
FFFooooooooorrrrrrrrrrffffffffffeeeeeeeiiiiiiiiiiittttttttttttttuuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee................................

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

CON stayed on topic and did not forfeit

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

No reasonable arugument from Pro.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

ehyeh is going to hell advocating sexual attraction as opposed to selebicy.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

CON stayed on topic and did not forfeit.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro made no point while Con pointed out that Pro made no point. Also, forfeiture is forfeiture.

The word "forfeiture" or "forfeit" is being used way too often on this site, that said.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro trills entire debate, Con at leasts asks relevant questions.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Presumption goes neg. I really do not see the point that pro was trying to make. There are progressive styles of debate, but even with this, one must link into the resolution and provide some level of analysis. This simply is not given here. Really this round just feels more like Pro was trolling, and this along with the FF also merits a conduct point.