You pick the topic.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 20,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Here's a chance for you to design the platform based on your topic selection.
We'll obviously have opposing sides.
Whatever topic you choose of course, it'll fit whichever side it falls on for you in tandem with the position preset .
***THE TOPICS CANNOT BE DUPLICATE. IT'S AN AUTOMATIC FORFEITING IF THR SAME TOPIC IS CHOSEN***
Questions and concerns, leave a comment or send a message.
I didn’t think plagiarizing was a thing on this site. But Con plagiarized himself from another debate. This is another straightforward decision with a victory for Con. My RFD is very similar to the previous one because of this.
S/G: I award this to Pro. Their sentences made sense and were easy to ready grammatically and structurally. Co on the other hand had run-on sentences (like the very first sentence). Second “sentence” has a sentence fragment as well just as another example.
Conduct: I am giving the points to Pro because Con basically plagiarized his own argument from another debate. Basically a verbatim copy paste.
Sources: I am going to give this to Pro because they provided a source unlike Con. The source is an official government website from the US Trade Representative, highlighting the benefits provided by Mexico in terms of trade. This gives a clear reason why the US shouldn’t nuke Mexico
Arguments: This one goes to Pro as well. The S/G by Pro really makes it hard to understand their argument. My understanding is that Pro makes an argument for defense and preservation of lives in the United States. However, this argument only helps the Pro side of the argument. Defense/sovereignty is an argument Con would bring up. Pro supports his position with the innocence defense and the precedent argument, both of which are compelling and coherent unlike Con’s arguments.
Pro wins.
8 hours left, and no votes. Please, if you are to vote, make sure your vote meets the voting policy standards. It does not take much.
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: Ehyeh // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 1 points to Pro
>Reason for Decision:
"Mexico is an innocent country, and a trade ally of the US, thus, they have done nothing to deserve being wiped out. The level of devastation this will cause is critical, and Mexico has not wronged the US nor is in any conflict with them.
Mexico is close enough to the US, that American citizens will also be impacted by this (those closer to the southern border) thus we would be unnecessarily harming our own citizens.
This action will set dangerous international precedents on the use of nuclear weapons for convenience. "
>Reason for Mod Action:
This isn’t an RFD, just a direct quote of Pro’s final round. That is not sufficient.
**************************************************
Please vote for Mall.
Don't reward Novice for sniping.