Instigator / Pro
4
1533
rating
18
debates
36.11%
won
Topic
#3881

We should support abortion, the promotion of transgenderism and euthenasia

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
12
Better sources
2
8
Better legibility
2
4
Better conduct
0
4

After 4 votes and with 24 points ahead, the winner is...

RationalMadman
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
5,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
28
1706
rating
563
debates
68.12%
won
Description

I don't think any conservative can really defend conservative ideology and I welcome a debate with somebody who believes that murdering babies and the elderly is wrong.

No alternative plans allowed you have to debate against my proposition.

Declare yourself the winner Wylted, you're the president now.

To be clear, since I commented before the debate took place that I agreed with Con's claim supporting abortion, transgender, and euthanasia, I support them on the grounds of bodily autonomy, not population control.

-->
@Wylted

As per the voting policy:
"Any unexcused forfeited round merits an automatic conduct loss, but arguments must still be voted on or justified as a tie. Repeated forfeitures waives the need to consider arguments (you still may, but by the choice of one side to miss at least 40% of the debate, the requirement ceases. And yes, this does apply to Choose Winner, which otherwise would not allow conduct to be the sole determinant)."

You literally forfeited 75% of the debate. So I don't have to consider arguments if I don't want to. This is why I put "technical" in front of full forfeiture. It wasn't a complete full forfeiture, but it technically could be considered one.

-->
@Public-Choice

I made an argument in the last round. Not a full forfeitures. Maybe partial

-->
@Barney
@K_Michael
@Public-Choice
@Sir.Lancelot
@AustinL0926

Debate is over, skip to last Round.

Abortions don’t terminate “babies,” they terminate zygotes, blastocysts, embryos, unviable fetuses, and on some occasions even a viable fetus to save the woman or in rare cases, a twin (and the mother).

No one believes murdering the elderly is acceptable.

It’s also a false equivalency fallacy to compare an abortion to the murder of the elderly.

-->
@Wylted

Your view on this is psychotic and crazy.

I am too scared to ask if he used Google translate or if he already is better at Esperanto than me.

Fuck I still have time to post. Didn't expect to come back to that. Nice and I have Thanksgiving off of work

tbh, I would have accepted this one. The harder position is to defend abortion and transgenderism and euthanasia.

-->
@PREZ-HILTON

Silentu soyboy, mi instruu vin kiel fari konservativan propagandon.

-->
@RationalMadman

Don't try to use misspelling against me. English is not my first language. I am a southerner.

Thank God a conservative willing to defend their stupid ideology of thinking murder of babies and the elderly is wrong or their stupid ideology that it is wrong to cut off a child's penis

-->
@Wylted

I agree on all counts except your spelling of euthanasia.