Instigator
Points: 10

"Cultural Marxism" is a Nazi conspiracy theory

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 4 votes the winner is ...
Alec
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Politics
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender
Points: 28
Description
No information
Round 1
Published:
I watched the video you stated.  It had some bias and did not cite their sources with any links, they just cited with things that viewers would have a hard time fact checking.  However, it basically said that Cultural Marxism was not a threat to Western civilization.  It said that Cultural Marxism was a term invented by Nazis and they interchangeably use it to describe the left.  However, Cultural Marxism is very much alive and are not a conspiracy theory.

Cultural Marxism is, "idea that traditional culture is the source of oppression in the modern world"(https://www.gotquestions.org/cultural-Marxism.html).  The site is biased, but I modified the definition to try to be more objective.  In other words, it's a bunch of westerners that hate the west for influencing it's power on others.  I don't agree with Cultural Marxism, but many left leaning people don't like the west/the US for being imperialist/racist.  Colin Kapernick is an example of a Cultural Marxist, since he thinks the US is racist.  Black Lives Matter believes in pretty much the same thing.  Same thing for tens of millions of Americans nationwide.

Cultural Marxism is far from a rumor imposed by the Right.  It is a reality.
Round 2
Forfeited
Published:
Big boy argument extended.
Round 3
Forfeited
Published:
Extended.
Added:
--> @RationalMadman
Fine but don't inflame my nut sack.
Instigator
#4
Added:
I will always be egotistical, asking me to change that is like asking you to avoid being angry. I don't intend to insult you or hurt you and just want to talk.
#3
Added:
--> @RationalMadman
Yes, it's possible....but not likely.
Instigator
#2
Added:
Is it possible you could unblock me?
#1
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Also going to echo Mharman here; Pro offered nothing but an unexplained link to a YouTube video. I don't have any explicit objection to using a YouTube video as a source, but you should at least summarize within your argument why you are providing a source and not expect the source to speak for you as the entirety of your argument. Con offered a basic rebuttal, Pro then forfeit the remainder of the debate. Easy win for Con.
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full forfeit
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
"Con was the only one to make an argument. Pro just linked us to a Youtube video.
Con also forfeited more than half of the debate."
Mharman speaks for me.
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Con was the only one to make an argument. Pro just linked us to a Youtube video.
Con also forfeited more than half of the debate.