Instigator / Pro
4
1266
rating
119
debates
15.97%
won
Topic
#570

The Hebrew tribes are extinct, therefor "Jews" are not a race but are in fact followers of a Hebrew race cult known as "Judaism"

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

That1User
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
7
1453
rating
12
debates
37.5%
won
Description

No information

-->
@David

I have to disagree, Type1 DOES sound like an anti-Semite. Saying that we Jews will merit Gentile slaves when Mashiach arrives... I’ve never heard more bogus in my life. A little Rambam could correct him, but I bet he wouldn’t even know who that was, or, if he does, wouldn’t care.

That’s how he comes off to me, I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t see any silver lining here.

-->
@Coreyinthehouse

Vote Reported: Coreyinthehouse // Mod Action: Removed

Points awarded: 5 points for arguments, conduct, and grammar

Reason for decision:

I hold KawaiiKame had been conduct because some of the statements by Type1 seems very biased against Jews as a whole, I'm not saying they're antisemetic by any means but they seem to have something against the culture seeing as they brought up "every Jew will have 1000 gentile slaves when the messiah comes." And "Even the so-called Jews that are atheists will get hyper aggressive and intellectually dishonest on you with 1984-like doublethink and blind rage" this is stereotyping them as a whole, and doesn't belong in debates IMO.
The grammar and spelling was a tie, as I didn't notice any issues in either side.
Both sources seem to be fairly reliable, however one slated by Type1 called establishing them as a race "dangerous."
This IMO, is ridiculous and therefore I hold Kame's are more valid. Establishing a religious descendancy as a race is far from dangerous, as what exactly determines race is gray in the first place. The only way this would be "dangerous" is if the religious itself was "dangerous."
Kame's arguments are more convincing IMO largely because he cites more reliable sources and references more facts.

Reason for mod removal: This vote fails to meet the COC vote standards