Instigator / Pro
12
1266
rating
119
debates
15.97%
won
Topic

The sizzling manhood of my brobdingnagian wanker shaft is far larger than yours

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
0
9
Sources points
6
6
Spelling and grammar points
3
3
Conduct points
3
3

With 3 votes and 9 points ahead, the winner is ...

RationalMadman
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Nature
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender / Con
21
1771
rating
392
debates
66.96%
won
Description
~ 0 / 5,000

No information

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

RM is a total master of twisting the title of the debate and hammering home an easy win.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Hah!

Con destroyed pro both in debate style - by pointing out that pro has not provided any support for his position. The fact that he did this whilst coming with a pretty damn decent rap that itself was better than cons based upon insults, and flow (Did I say shittin’? Well that lack precision; this wannabe competitor is lickin’ what I sharted - genius!) - automatically awards him the win.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

CON somehow added debate elements to his rap showing how PRO did not meet the necessary requirements to win the debate all while spitting a better rap.

Wowza.