Instigator / Pro
35
1266
rating
119
debates
15.97%
won
Topic
#633

Jews are descended from fallen angels and run the Illuminati

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
15
3
Better sources
10
4
Better legibility
5
2
Better conduct
5
1

After 5 votes and with 25 points ahead, the winner is...

Type1
Tags
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
10
1466
rating
3
debates
16.67%
won
Description

No information

Classic type1.

I don't know much about this guy, but seems like he is banned right now. I would place it in society's class or religion's class.

-->
@User_2006

It was created by a user with an /interesting/ sense of humor.

Wtf why is this in the cars class?

-->
@Type1

"I am not talking about divine beings that were cast from heaven or something gay like that. "

Even though I'm Christian this was funny as heck lmao ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

-->
@Type1

what do you call the topic your debating. because i thought it was a conspiracy theory.

this is a good theory i have for you Mr type 1
https://youtu.be/vT3ZnTHYXIY

Jesus fucking ass titties, you guys and your theories.

-->
@crossed

It's the other way around. They actually are alien demigods, they pretended to be demons serving Satan in the past.

oh pro needs to look into the alien deception conspiracy theory's. the theory is about how they are going to say aliens exist but there going to be fallen angles.

in are ancient past the demons set themselves up as god and people in Egypt and around the world worshiped them now thy are going to pretend to be aliens.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=+alien+deception

-->
@Type1

"If so then "Progressivism" is more fitting for your profile because to real leftists liberal just implies a slightly more left wing capitalist"
Yeah your right but would like a political compass quiz to actually have the option of progressivism before I know what I am more of.

"but if people are not reasonable there will always be shitty ideas."
Shouldn't we try to help people? Less dumb people in the world the better.

"The answer is to make people reasonable not to bring in the thought police,"
You can think but you can't say whatever you like.

"When people rely on authority to tell them what is true then authority can tell them things that are not true and they will believe it"
Which is why I want people to be rational not free speech absolutists.

"it is a lifetime of experience dealing with idiots."
Shame you are not trying to help them understand now.

"This is the real problem, and the root cause of idiotic and harmful ideas in the first place."
Don't know about this.

-->
@TheRealNihilist

Okay so I take it you're a Soc-Dem which is better than a neo-liberal. If so then "Progressivism" is more fitting for your profile because to real leftists liberal just implies a slightly more left wing capitalist. Now you say "if people were reasonable and actually made decisions based on rationale then this wouldn't be a problem." but if people are not reasonable there will always be shitty ideas. The answer is to make people reasonable not to bring in the thought police, otherwise humanity will be just as stupid and will rely on authority to tell them what is true. When people rely on authority to tell them what is true then authority can tell them things that are not true and they will believe it, thus the ones in charge of censoring will be the ones who need to be censored. You can run your stupid mouth and say I am not reasonable but you are the one who thinks spoon feeding the public information that is accepted by the establishment is a better alternative to promoting reason. You say I should help them understand but as I already explained when I try to do that I get the same reaction as if I were to tell people Tupac is alive and hiding in antarctica with the wyte walkers. This is not a victim card, it is a lifetime of experience dealing with idiots.
We already have a system that assumes people are naturally unreasonable and they have to be programmed rather than taught critical thinking. This is the real problem, and the root cause of idiotic and harmful ideas in the first place.

-->
@Type1

"I have been telling plenty of truth in my time on the internet, more than enough to make up for the odd bit of trolling I do."
Never said you can't be honest. I wasn't annoyed at trolling instead of how you troll.

"When I tell the truth I am usually met with ridicule, censorship and stupidity and it amounts to the same results I would get if I were to tell people the moon is made of onion bagels."
Is this the victim card or are you trying to make excuses for taking reasonable enough actions to stop your "truth" from being distorted?

"I can't help that the vast majority of people are retarded ass wipes and if some schizophrenic nut case takes this seriously and is influenced by what I say the crazy mother fucker would have been set off eventually anyway. The fact that everyone is a fucking idiot other than me should not be grounds for me to be censored."
You should help them understand. If you don't they wouldn't know they are wrong and go around and actual thing what you said in this debate was correct.

What? I wanted regulated capitalism. Is that good enough for you to understand I am not a neo-liberal?
If calling you out on not being reasonable is virtue-signalling then so be it.

I am for public healthcare and withdraw from wars. Is that good enough for you to understand I am not a conservative?

"the way to eliminate shitty ideas is not to censor everything you don't like but to expose people to the truth and raise kids to have critical thinking skills."
It is with education not platforming awful ideas. You don't understand that if people were reasonable and actually made decisions based on rationale then this wouldn't be a problem. Education helps that not freedom of speech.

-->
@TheRealNihilist

Listen up you fucking barrel of monkey cunts. I have been telling plenty of truth in my time on the internet, more than enough to make up for the odd bit of trolling I do. When I tell the truth I am usually met with ridicule, censorship and stupidity and it amounts to the same results I would get if I were to tell people the moon is made of onion bagels. I can't help that the vast majority of people are retarded ass wipes and if some schizophrenic nut case takes this seriously and is influenced by what I say the crazy mother fucker would have been set off eventually anyway. The fact that everyone is a fucking idiot other than me should not be grounds for me to be censored.

You are an ignorant neo-liberal cock holster that thinks being a leftist is about feelings and virtue signaling meanwhile you support the same capitalist establishment that is gang raping the earth and the human race. You know what you are? You're just a fucking conservative with a testosterone deficiency.

"Can't make a good argument yip yip yip" you sound like a talking chihuahua. Here's an argument for you, the way to eliminate shitty ideas is not to censor everything you don't like but to expose people to the truth and raise kids to have critical thinking skills.

-->
@Type1

"Anyone who takes this seriously is a retard who should be in psychiatric ward to begin with."
But there are people who are irrational and do actions based on emotions. What don't you understand about that? A clear example is the vote for Trump. None of them can even defend their vote for Trump rationally instead it was a f*ck you to the system.

"No, people should not be obligated to "remove ideas they don't agree with" you stupid Orwellian wank biscuit."
Don't get annoyed when you find out supremacists are finding comfort in your debates.

"Now go bother someone who gives a rats ass about your whiny, annoying finger wagging BS."
Can't make a good argument. Resort to insults. Come back to me when you know when normalising extreme ideas does make them prone to actually taking those ideas seriously.

-->
@TheRealNihilist

Anyone who takes this seriously is a retard who should be in psychiatric ward to begin with.

No, people should not be obligated to "remove ideas they don't agree with" you stupid Orwellian wank biscuit.

Now go bother someone who gives a rats ass about your whiny, annoying finger wagging BS.

-->
@Type1

It is not funny when people who agree with this don't see the sense of humour. We normalise this and then we wonder why there are so many supremacists. Surely we didn't lessen how bad claims about Jewish people are so that people who are disenfranchised can find meaning in being a supremacist. Everyone has an obligation to take reasonable actions to remove ideas they do not agree with on their platform or at least I hope they do. Nowhere have you given a supremacist or someone who agrees with you a statement stating this is based on humour. Now the closet supremacists can read this debate and confirm their biases or people who are more gullible see the merit in a nonsensical idea.

-->
@TheRealNihilist

You have no sense of humor and condone censorship I see. Jolly good for you old bean, now bugger off.

-->
@Type1

Trash debate you are deliberately spreading false information. If the mod did delete your previous one they are justified. The question would be why haven't they deleted this one?

-->
@Type1

Change this debate to, "All Jews are descended from fallen angels and run the Illuminati" and I think I'll accept the debate.

-->
@Type1

I'm considering accepting this debate.

-->
@RationalMadman

I made another debate which got deleted immediately after in an act of censorship which is most in line with what I was saying earlier about free speech. I made this one to troll the mods.

-->
@Type1

somewhat, yes.