1587
rating
209
debates
55.26%
won
Topic
#6386
No Country For Old Men: The film’s ending is narratively unsatisfying.
Status
Open challenge
The first member to accept the challenge becomes the contender.
Debate will be automatically deleted in:
00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Rated
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
- Minimal rating
- 1,720
Contender / Con
Open position
?
rating
?
debates
?
won
Description
Movie Summary: While out hunting, Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin) finds the grisly aftermath of a drug deal. Though he knows better, he cannot resist the cash left behind and takes it with him. The hunter becomes the hunted when a merciless killer named Chigurh (Javier Bardem) picks up his trail. Also looking for Moss is Sheriff Bell (Tommy Lee Jones), an aging lawman who reflects on a changing world and a dark secret of his own, as he tries to find and protect Moss.
Rules:
1. Discussion is about the movie. The book is too different and will not count as evidence.
2. Two forfeits are a concession.
Round 1
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 2
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 3
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 4
Not published yet
Not published yet
I'm aware, but it's been a busy work week, so accepting this will have to wait for now.
You have been issued a challenge
Yeah but I would rather this be a forum topic. Artistic views are hardly debatable.
Yes, and that's the point.
A lot of people arrange certain rules, define stipulations, limits, and the overall narrative of the debate.
I prefer to leave it up to interpretation, in order to see whose framing is stronger. Who controls the narrative better, according to voters.
But it his highly subjective tho isn't it. As an argument i could say that it was satisfying to me.