Seven Lions Is Better Than Illenium
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
I will waive the first round, and you will waive the last round.
Conduct to pro for the forfeit.
Arguments. While both sides gave me reasons why one is better, neither side really gave me any framework to determine who was right. It’s a common problem - but essentially part of the argument should be what constitutes being better, and why.
My issue here, as a result, is that both sides gave reasons as to why one was better than the other: but any attempt to weigh this would be completely arbitrary without a framework - especially considering the arguments being made where themselves subjective (such as being chilled - or that best is more completely matching the genre).
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Melcharaz // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 1 point to Pro for S/G
>Reason for Decision: what is supersawwy? didn't find it in dictionary, i assume he meant supersavvy. Anyways, i don't care for either band so im leaving tie.
>Reason for Mod Action: In order to award S/G points, the voter must (1) give specific examples of S/G errors, (2) explain how these errors were excessive, and (3) compare each debater's S/G. The voter only does the first of these, and makes no attempt to complete the other two necessary steps.
************************************************************************
Why u no vote