Instigator
Points: 29

I'm gay

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 6 votes the winner is ...
Sparrow
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
People
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender
Points: 34
Description
No information
Round 1
Published:
I'm gay.
Published:
This debate is bullshit, you cannot prove that you are gay without exposing your IRL identity and this debate is also against the rules by it's very nature.
Round 2
Forfeited
Forfeited
Round 3
Forfeited
Forfeited
Added:
--> @Ramshutu
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Ramshutu // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: Only con offered an argument. Arguments to con.
>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit debate. Per the site's voting policy, full-forfeit debates are not moderated.
************************************************************************
#9
Added:
--> @Type1
you literally proved my point lmao 😂😂😂
#8
Added:
Maybe he wants to be kicked out.
#7
Added:
--> @Type1
Dude that's a one way ticket to azkaBAN if I ever saw one. Cool it before they kick you out permanently.
Contender
#6
Added:
--> @Our_Boat_is_Right
Shut up you neo nazi halfwit idiot. It's not my fault you are too busy jerking off to Jesus' mutilated corpse to realize when I am joking and when I'm not. You are a christian and a right winger, therefor anything you say about "logic" is equally valid to a toddler giving a lecture about quantum mechanics. You are a sperm guzzling toddler groping crotch licking chicken fucker, shut your god damn mouth.
Instigator
#5
Added:
why would anybody debate with type1. He is a conspiracy theory lunatic that has no logic at all. He is a lot like Alex Jones in this respect with all of their craziness.
#4
Added:
How am I supposed to contend that?
You could be a gorilla with a 145 IQ being experimented on in Area 51 for all I know. You could be an alien that has no conceptions of gender or sexual orientation whatsoever.
#3
Added:
--> @Type1
Truism debates go against the terms of service, I think.
#2
Added:
--> @Type1
False
#1
#6
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
An unverifiable claim by Pro. Argument to Con
No sources, tie.
Con uses "it's" where "its" is correct. Grammar and spelling to Pro.
Forfeit is a result of being banned. Counting it against him would be voting based on events outside of the debate, which would be unfair. Tied.
#5
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro failed to make a falsifiable statement. Con correctly points out that any direct counter risked violation of DART RoC. Mazel tov to Pro. Arguments to Con. Conduct to Con cuz Pro forfeits first.
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
(1) Both forfeited their remaining rounds.
(2) PRO said they are gay and thus no one can really disprove that. So they win by default. There is nothing CON can say to disprove that.
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Only con offered an argument. Arguments to con.
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro knows he's gay, Pro said he's gay. Con says we need to dox Pro to know if he's gay or not but who is society to say that? Nowhere in Con's argument is it made clear why if Pro is doxxing himself by outing as a gay IRL, then why it's an issue.
Doxxing is only wrong if others do it, this is something Pro didn't have to type, it's a given and even if it's wrong it would be wrong means to prove the resolution true, which Con strongly showed fear of happening as the resolution is true.
Conduct to Pro because Con called this debate 'bullshit' and denied Pro's right to confirm himself as gay whether or not we dox him and judge this for ourselves.
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Both sides forfeited, but pro never upheld his BOP