Instigator / Pro
14
1266
rating
119
debates
15.97%
won
Topic

"benevolent oligarchy" is oxymoronic

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
6
3
Sources points
4
4
Spelling and grammar points
2
2
Conduct points
2
2

With 2 votes and 3 points ahead, the winner is ...

Type1
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Politics
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender / Con
11
1495
rating
47
debates
48.94%
won
Description
~ 0 / 5,000

No information

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro made a basic argument to relating to oligarchy, pro makes a similarly light counter, “Even if what you say is true, why can one class not be benevolent towards the other?”, this enough to cast doubt on pros point - but isn’t enough to justify his part of the resolution, this leads to a draw being the only rational conclusion.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Both sides FF post-R1. Con baselessly asserts his own definitions but never defies the reasoning Pro gives of the following kind:

"the more authority there is the more class there is, and the more class there is the more the interests of the people at large and the people in power are divided. "

Pro wins, gg :) Nice one type1! :)