Ok, firstly about this:
"The name of Spit fire is violent, spitting fire is not what we want people to do to each other that's violent and grievous bodliy harm has come not just from fire but from literally the plan Supermarine Spitefire..."
I do not care about which has a less violent name and by the way, the meaning of spitfire is: A person with a fierce temper, according to
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/spitfire. Another fact, what is the meaning of bodliy. Did you mean to say bodily? And it is spelt S-P-I-T-F-I-R-E, not Spitefire. Also, I would appreciate it if you typed Spitfire as one word, and not Spit fire. Plus, the plane does not literally spit fire.
Next:
War is bad, killing is bad. The plan designed for that instead for covert ops and prevention of wars is therefore the more immoral one.
We are NOT debating about which plan is more immoral. As a matter of fact, the Spitfire is not only designed to kill. Haven't you heard of a Spitfire designed for reconnaissance? The Spitfire PR Mk XIX is not designed to bash Germans out of the sky, but rather it's used to 'spy'.
Next:
I think the name flows better. Sup-er-mar-ine spit-fire is only catching because it's alliteration. Hawker Hurricane has a much smoother flowing exist from the lips as you can gawk as you say it and yell it powerfully
As I have mentioned, we are NOT debating about the planes' names. Also, please spell Spitfire with a upper case 'S', as it is a Proper Noun (Please do not make me give you english lessons).
Now, I do not get what this is about:
HAWKER HURRICAAAAAAAAAAAAANE YEAH BABY!
Next:
Going faster doesn't matter. The Hawker Hurricane is able to avoid crashing due to that. Why do you want to go that fast? Speeding kills lives, are you a fan of drunk drivers and how hooligans are on the road?
Well, as a matter of fact, we are talking about planes in the SKY. Both your argument and source are talking about the road, which is not relevant to this debate. Why I want it to go that fast? Well, because firstly, you would really want to get the hell out if a Nazi Bf 109 is on your tail and is trying to shoot you down. Secondly, it would be beneficial in some way if you get to the enemy while he is not already bombing the asses off your own factories. It would also be good if you could get up there before the enemy starts strafing you to the bones and shooting your brains out, literally. And, the Hurricane's slow speed did not do anything to reduce crashes. For example, it is impossible to do a upwards roll in a Hurricane at low speed, which compared to the Spitfire, is very slow indeed.
Now:
Climbing faster? more prone to crash, less prone to save.
Well, as I said, this would be a great advantage if you're being chased by a Messerschmitt Me 262 or any of those 'big boys'. You don't want to be caught at a height disadvantage in a dogfight, or in other words, you don't want to stare upwards at your opponent as he could easily dive, and trading altitude for speed, he could riddle you with bullets, which is the most unpleasant thing in a fight.
Next:
Better at fighting? Better at killing humans, less prone to be safe.
Firstly, you would most probably get killed yourself if you don't do something. Secondly, fighting and killing are two different words. Fighting: The action of fighting; violence or conflict, and displaying or engaging in violence, combat, or aggression. Killing: An act of causing death, especially deliberately. So, you could simply damage your enemy's plane and force him to bale out instead of killing him.
Next:
Flies higher with superior service ceiling? Is built inferior at cruising lower down.
Going higher is important. As I have said before, you don't want to be stuck at a height disadvantage. And, who needs to be cruising down low when you can simply pounce your enemy from high above?
Now:
More agile? What is that supposed to mean? You mean more flimsy. The HH is sturdier so it also is much better in brutal winds and this is why you call it less agile. Sturdier people are less flexible.
More agile is supposed to mean that it can turn tighter, which is a great advantage if you're stuck in a twisting dogfight with a Mitsubishi A6M or a Messerschmitt Me 262. I do not mean more flimsy. Also, please write the names instead of typing SS or HH. As a matter of fact, if you are caught in brutal winds, you're opponent would also be caught in the wind, and he will most probably retreat too, so what's the use in fighting better in brutal winds if there's no fight at all? Also, your source is talking about humans, which is a totally different topic altogether.
More sources:
They probably fixed it in later versions, but I feel like the Hurricane is not AS great because it has a fuel injection engine rather than a carburetor.
That alone reduces its performance in certain areas such as Zero G maneuvers and inverted maneuvers
Hello