the body can distinguish between good and evil
our body kills the bad germs but spares the good germs
if god created the universe then it would make sense that he would be able to tell the difference between good and bad
but
if a bunch of nothing created the universe like science says then it
would make more sense that they would kill all germs not just the bad
ones
for example when you wash your hands
with soap the soap is not able to distinguish between good and bad germs
it just kills them all. thus since it can distinguish it. it means god
designed it.
god made animals specifically to live in environment
god created the polar bear white so that it can hide better in snow
god created the dog to shed its fur during the summer because he knew summers are hot and less fur would cool the dog down
god created the dog to grow more fur during the winter so that it can keep warm. inter coat
god created the mountain goat has feet that make it easier to climb mountains
god created the owl with night vision because night is dark and the owl would need a way to see.
predators have big teeth because god intended them to hunt.
god created the cats with scratchy tongues so that they can clean there fur better and lick all meat off bones easier
god created the bat with echo location so that it can roam easier at night because at not you can not see
god created the bat with black coloring so it can hide better at night
god designed the beaver with big teeth so it can chew down its trees for dam.
in all these examples god is using intelligence or intellect.
examples of man made things or others so you can see they use the same logic
a man in fire country makes is house out out of metal so his house does not burn down
some people do not use aluminum pans because they know that aluminum pans leach aluminum into food.
smart people do not put there house on a beach because of flooding issues
china knows that labor is expensive so they enslave children and have them work for them because the know its easier.
Facebook was created addicting so that more people would use it.
google was created free so that they could get people to sign away there souls easier with there terms of service.
china use to lace its products with lead because they knew the Americans would buy them because its cheap.
do you believe evolution
do you believe that all the dogs who could not shed its fur during the summer died out.
why would the dogs who could not shed its fur during the summer die out. because i do not believe lacking the ability to shed its fur would cause them to go extinct. extra furry doggy should not die out because they can can not shed its fur.
why is there a no shedding gene in dogs since that trait use to exist but died out. there is none because it never existed
is it possible that we can reintroduce this gene my do sheds to much.
do you believe that the beaver use to have small teeth but died out because it could not chew down trees so it evolve with big teeth.
were are all the fossils of small teeth beavers.
what did the beaver do before it got big teeth.
what happened to the ecosystem because there were no dams. because all the beavers have small teeth
why would small teeth beavers die out because they can not chew down trees
did Justin beaver evolve from a beaver.
sources
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Wrick-It-Ralph // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: Tied.
>Reason for Mod Action: Votes which do not award points are not subject to review because no standard exists in the COC against by which they can be removed.
************************************************************************
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: K_Michael // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 7 points to Con
>Reason for Decision: "mash potatoes are gross" isn't a debate. It could have been put in the comments. R2 was effectively forfeited/waived by Pro. Combined with R3 forfeit, 2/3 forfeits; conduct to Con.
Pro mostly named traits and characteristics of animals that suited their environments, coupled with a claim that a being had to have intelligently created those animals with their features. His claim is unfounded, and all traits, as far as I could tell, had equal claims to natural selection. BoP requires a claim with more basis than an opposite claim. Even if there is a basis, Pro needs to show them. Argument to Con.
Pro's sources described animal characteristics, not corroborated claims. Con's sources showed relevant theories and definitions. Sources to Con.
Pro leaves off proper capitalizations and punctuation.
>Reason for Mod Action: The voter fails to sufficiently justify awarding sources and S/G points. To award sources, the voter must (1) explain how the sources impacted the debate, (2) analyze at least one source specifically, and (3) compare each debaters' source and use of them. The voter only performs the third task. To award S/G, the voter must (1) give specific examples of S/G errors, (2) explain how these errors were excessive, and (3) compare each debater's S/G. The voter does none of these tasks. Argument points were borderline, which means we default to treating them as sufficient. Conduct points were sufficient.
************************************************************************
This is not a full forfeit.
Could I have a clarification please!:
“A full-forfeit debate is defined as a debate that has no argument presented by one side following the opening round, resulting in all subsequent rounds being forfeited”
In this debate no argument was presented, but not all subsequent rounds were forfeited. Would this qualify as a full forfeit?
yes lets do this again
https://www.debateart.com/debates/794
We can rematch if you'd like. I'd prefer more than 5,000 characters if we are to properly battle.
i am on schools computers
my internet broke