Instigator / Con
21
1575
rating
5
debates
100.0%
won
Topic
#790

God is real

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
9
6
Better sources
6
6
Better legibility
3
3
Better conduct
3
2

After 3 votes and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...

vsp2019
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Twelve hours
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
17
1641
rating
63
debates
65.08%
won
Description

In the first round, I would like you to state which God/Gods you believe in and what are the main reasons for why you believe.

-->
@RationalMadman

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: RM // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: Tied.
>Reason for Mod Action: Votes which do not award points are not subject to review because no standard exists in the COC against by which they can be removed.
************************************************************************

-->
@Wrick-It-Ralph

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Wrick-It-Ralph // Mod action: Not Removed

>Points Awarded: Tied.

>Reason for Mod Action: Votes which do not award points are not subject to review because no standard exists in the COC against by which they can be removed.
************************************************************************

-->
@Wrick-It-Ralph

Oh ok lol

-->
@Speedrace

I know. But it feels good to type it.

-->
@Wrick-It-Ralph

And? Lol everyone knows that

-->
@Speedrace
@vsp2019

I believe no gods exist...…………………………………………………...

-->
@Ramshutu

I go like 2 huge assignments right after I accepted lol

-->
@Speedrace

I would like to point out a typo on my part in the last round and correct it here.

"My argument was that, to prove that the God of the New Testament is real, PRO would have to show how the article you cited failed to reach their own standards. "
I meant for it to say "My argument was that PRO would have to prove that the New Testament is reliable. The article you cited fail to reach even their own standards."

-->
@Speedrace

What does that even mean? Lol. I rebutted you and that's it. I did not insult you, I did not make derogatory comments towards you. I don't know what you mean by "hostile". Now it's your turn to respond to me.

-->
@vsp2019

I expected you to rebut, but I didn’t expect you to be so hostile and formal

-->
@Speedrace

I have no idea what you are talking about. This is a website called debateart, I opened this debate with main theme: God is real, and I took the CON position. Even if this was a discussion, whatever that means, do you think I would just read what you said and never rebut it? You agreed to the debate. Do you think people just come here to discuss with people without challenging each other?

Dude, what are you doing?

-->
@vsp2019

Dude, you said this was a discussion, not a debate, what are you doing?