Instigator / Pro
Points: 9

bsh1 guzzles jizz like a fish in a drinking contest

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 7 votes the winner is ...
TheRealNihilist
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Religion
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender / Con
Points: 47
Description
No information
Round 1
Published:
I saw him do it.
Published:
The burden is on you to provide evidence to support your claim. If not then the burden of the person making the positive claim has not been fulfilled and I have nothing to work with because I didn't see what you saw. So either you have video footage or you have no evidence to support your claim.  
Round 2
Published:
You can't prove that I didn't see it. the burden of proof is on you to prove that you aren't gay.
Published:
The instigator is shifting the burden of proof on me even though he made the claim first. This is unfair since he created the debate and expects the contender to prove what he did see without providing a link to like a picture or video of his claim. 
Round 3
Forfeited
Published:
I haven't gotten a response so all I can do is waive. 
Added:
******************************
Mod note: This is a troll debate. As such, votes like RM's won't be moderated.
******************************
#11
Added:
I don't know how you gave sources to the instigator when you said this "but Pro didn't remotely prove anything or give a shred of evidence beyond his own sight."
Contender
#10
Added:
" the burden of proof is on you to prove that you aren't gay."
this had me ded lmaooo
#9
Added:
drink of the week:
cherry berry non-dairy fish-jizzed gin
#8
Added:
I know it is you, not think.
#7
Added:
I can't believe RM thinks this cave troglodyte is me. He has lost all my respect as a result of him clearly having 0 respect for me.
#6
Added:
--> @TheRealNihilist
>> So pretty much he is still wrong.
Totally, lol.
#5
Added:
--> @bsh1
>>I'm an expensive, classy bish, not some cheap-ass street corner hoe."
So pretty much he is still wrong.
Contender
#4
Added:
--> @Alec
What exactly is jizz?
slang for "semen, sperm" from "jism" which meant "spirit, vim, energy" in the mid-19th century but quickly degenerated into Victorian euphemism and then degraded into 20th century vulgarities like jiz, jizz, jizzum, and jazz.
#3
Added:
What exactly is jizz?
#2
Added:
--> @TheRealNihilist
My argument would've been: "Obviously I don't *guzzle* jizz. Clearly I lick it off...things...sexily. Why? Because I'm an expensive, classy bish, not some cheap-ass street corner hoe."
#1
#7
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
As I said, I am too sexy to "guzzle" anything. Also loving the other RFDs on this debate <3
#6
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro trolled, that's poor conduct
#5
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Why would a fish enter a drinking contest? That would be like a human entering a breathing contest. Terrible simile. I like the internals- bsh => fish, guzzles => jilzz There's a poem in there somewhere but Pro never struck me as the poetic sort.
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
bsh1 is actually a very nice person SIR
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Bsh is like Tormond Giantsbane with milk.
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Troll be gone
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro was the only one with a second-hand source (himself). Pro. however, has forfeited the last Round and used ad hominem in Round 2 asking Con to prove he isn't gay as some kind of metaphor to proving that Bsh1 didn't guzzle jizz like a fish in a drinking contest.
I didn't really understand Pro's argument. If he saw him do it, he still has to debate for it and convince the reader of the event actually occurring.
Con failed to point out that there was something more Pro had to prove; that it was done like a fish in a drinking contest. This even could be Kritik'd as 'fish don't have drinking contests' makes it incomparable to begin with. None of these angles were taken by Con and it was disappointing but Pro didn't remotely prove anything or give a shred of evidence beyond his own sight.