Instigator / Pro
9
1266
rating
119
debates
15.97%
won
Topic
#845

bsh1 guzzles jizz like a fish in a drinking contest

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
21
Better sources
4
12
Better legibility
2
7
Better conduct
0
7

After 7 votes and with 38 points ahead, the winner is...

TheRealNihilist
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
47
1650
rating
44
debates
77.27%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

As I said, I am too sexy to "guzzle" anything. Also loving the other RFDs on this debate <3

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro trolled, that's poor conduct

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Why would a fish enter a drinking contest? That would be like a human entering a breathing contest. Terrible simile. I like the internals- bsh => fish, guzzles => jilzz There's a poem in there somewhere but Pro never struck me as the poetic sort.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

bsh1 is actually a very nice person SIR

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Bsh is like Tormond Giantsbane with milk.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Troll be gone

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro was the only one with a second-hand source (himself). Pro. however, has forfeited the last Round and used ad hominem in Round 2 asking Con to prove he isn't gay as some kind of metaphor to proving that Bsh1 didn't guzzle jizz like a fish in a drinking contest.

I didn't really understand Pro's argument. If he saw him do it, he still has to debate for it and convince the reader of the event actually occurring.

Con failed to point out that there was something more Pro had to prove; that it was done like a fish in a drinking contest. This even could be Kritik'd as 'fish don't have drinking contests' makes it incomparable to begin with. None of these angles were taken by Con and it was disappointing but Pro didn't remotely prove anything or give a shred of evidence beyond his own sight.