Instigator
Points: 14

Virtuoso gropes little boys and is sexually attracted to animals

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 9 votes the winner is ...
TheRealNihilist
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Philosophy
Time for argument
Two days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One month
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Points: 63
Description
No information
Round 1
Forfeited
Published:
You would have to ask Virtuoso but from the looks of his comment
here:
"As disgusting as Type1 is, bsh is correct. This is a troll debate and allowable under the COC."

He finds it disgusting. A person who does said would more than likely likes doing said thing. Since he finds it "disgusting" I doubt he does like doing said thing. I await for Type1 to provide evidence of Virtuoso like these said things. 

Round 2
Forfeited
Published:
I await an argument. 
Round 3
Forfeited
Published:
I await an argument. 
Added:
--> @blamonkey
I laughed way too hard at that RFD
#16
Added:
--> @Pinkfreud08
lol dude when u told me this debate existed I litterally didn't think you were serious XD
#15
Added:
Hope my RFD explains the debate well. It was hard to analyze all of those complex arguments.
#14
Added:
--> @Club
Technically, it doesn't allow either. Mods just don't enforce violations of the COC which are made against mods.
#13
Added:
--> @bsh1
So the COC allows members to attack moderators, but not other members?
#12
Added:
--> @TheRealNihilist, @Sparrow
This debate is not being allowed to stand because it's a troll debate per se. In order to ensure that users feel able to "speak truth to power" or to protest moderation, moderation does not enforce the entire conduct policy against those who insult members of the moderation team. This position also prevents moderation from having to deal with the headache of some user accusing us of silencing those who would criticize moderation. This policy ensures that users feel maximally free in their ability to talk about moderation.
Ultimately, you can insult myself and Virt however you want with no repercussions, period. We accepted that when we took the jobs we did. The *only* things you cannot do to myself and Virt are doxx us, hack us, genuinely attempt to impersonate us, or seriously threaten us. For other, less senior moderators, similar standards apply, except that (a) threats of any kind are prohibited and (b) particularly serious or unceasing personal attacks against them are prohibited.
#11
Added:
--> @TheRealNihilist
That’s not a call out debate.
#10
Added:
--> @Virtuoso
https://www.buzzfeed.com/jeremybender/animals-that-are-sexy-and-know-it
#9
Added:
--> @Virtuoso
Can't you do whatever you said you were going to about this?
https://www.debateart.com/debates/780
Isn't this a call-out debate?
Contender
#8
Added:
--> @TheRealNihilist
As disgusting as Type1 is, bsh is correct. This is a troll debate and allowable under the COC.
#7
Added:
--> @Virtuoso
>>Virtuoso gropes little boys and is sexually attracted to animals
What does moderation have to do with this?
You are moderating the site. You can't be groping little animals or into bestiality when you are on the site moderating.
Contender
#6
Added:
--> @bsh1
Can this really be called criticism? I think it's more akin to slander and childish adhominem.
#5
Added:
--> @TheRealNihilist
Because criticisms of moderation are almost entirely exempt from moderation.
#4
Added:
--> @bsh1
Why isn't this taken down?
Contender
#3
Added:
--> @oromagi
Yes I do.
Contender
#2
#9
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full forfeit LOL
#8
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Very tough battle but I think Omar wins in the end because of forfeits
#7
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NRKiBU4en5C-GgLsqvBdYm5SNy73b-LHAosNAzc5iVw/edit?usp=sharing
Good job guys! Here is the RFD. Took me a while to analyze the complex argumentation used throughout the debate; however, I am glad that I did for this clearly stellar debate.
#6
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Forfeit due to deserved ban.
#5
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Forfeited is a pretty compelling argument, but con's r1 argument blows this out of the water.
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
What, I wonder, did Pro hope to accomplish?
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full FF that's poor conduct
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full forfeit
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
FF