Instigator
Points: 15

I am a radical left-winger who hates Jews and believes the rich should be killed and/or put in gulags

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 4 votes the winner is ...
Ramshutu
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Economics
Time for argument
Twelve hours
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One month
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender
Points: 21
Description
No information
Round 1
Published:
all men are created equal

there is no logical reasonings why all ppls should not get equal moneys unless they are womens or jews or niggers.
Published:
The nature of your repeated inflammatory debates indicate that you’re merely a troll - thus are only making these claims for attention.

Round 2
Forfeited
Published:
As indicated by his being banned: he is merely a troll!

Added:
I blocked Type1. If he's truly upset at Capitalists, get off welfare and get a job.
#6
Added:
--> @Virtuoso
ok.
#5
Added:
--> @Dr.Franklin
Type1 is banned for 3 months. The next ban will be a permanent one .
#4
Added:
is this guy banned yet?
#3
Added:
--> @Virtuoso
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Virtuoso // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 7 points to Con
>Reason for Mod Action: Troll debates are not moderated, per the site voting policy guidelines. No moderation action is appropriate on this vote.
*******************************************************************
#2
Added:
--> @Ramshutu
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ercWS-jUt0s
#1
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Punking shite is what
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Counter vote bomb
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
I was unclear what Con was trying to convey or meant by 'troll'. It seems to me like Con intended there to insult Pro or to convey something about Pro that somehow related to the resolution. I'm just not sure, it seems like semantic games to me and badly executed at that. Gotta say this is poor conduct and S&G. I truly didn't understand what Con was trying to convey and the use of a colon in the last Round, it felt like an inverted run-on sentence, where he split it up and I just couldn't follow? Colons are meant to be used before lists, what was the list?
Not only does Con insult Pro, I feel he gish galloped, trying to overload Con with too much to handle. This adds to the conduct mark. I just couldn't grasp Con's points. They were poorly communicated and outright rude at times intended only to evoke reaction. Don't be so strange, Con, it makes normies like me struggle to grasp your cryptic but possibly intelligent points.
Pro uses himself as a primary source for his own urges, I feel like this was a great use of source and the argument that all men are created equal and the sexist connotation of one who truly believed in that disliking women adds to how radical an outlook Pro has. Con relies on second-hand sourcing and frankly was outright rude to assume he knew the inner workings and thoughts of Pro. Poor sourcing and arguments, Con.
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro ff half of the debate, that's poor conduct