I am a Communist and I hate everyone who has more moneys than me which is everyone
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 8 votes and with 34 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- One day
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
Full forfeit
Forfeiture.
FF
I'm tired of debates that center an argument around something unprovable, like someone's personal opinion. There is technically no way for Con to prove that Pro's opinion is, especially in contradiction to what Pro says.
If the argument cannot be logically made, then it is not a debate. As it is not a debate, Pro loses automatically for creating a false debate. There isn't technically a clause in the CoC about this, but there should be.
Conduct goes to Con because Pro purposely created an undebatable topic.
Apoplectic anti-counterclimatic vote blob
Unapologetic vote bob.
I can't believe you accepted the debate. I wanted to but guess you did.
The Instigator/Pro forfeited half the Rounds which can be seen with Type1 forfeting Round 2. This meant Ramshutu did not recieve a rebuttal to his claims and went unchallenged.
Bad conduct.
Pro FF half of the rounds, that's poor conduct.
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: RationalMadman // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 7-points to Pro
>Reason for Decision: Apologetic counter vote-bob
>Reason for Mod Action: While this is a troll debate, it is also a full-forfeit. Where these two moderation paradigms conflict, it is important for reasons of fairness to prefer the latter. Because the voter is voting for the debater that committed the full-forfeit, their vote is removable.
************************************************************************
Vote bomb. I hate auto fail
Vote bob; he is unapologetic