Instigator / Pro
Points: 22

I am a Communist and I hate everyone who has more moneys than me which is everyone

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 8 votes the winner is ...
Ramshutu
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Movies
Time for argument
One day
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One month
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender / Con
Points: 56
Description
No information
Round 1
Published:
I fantasize about Marx spanking me.
Published:
You obviously don’t hate everyone, as you are clearly irrationally craving attention from all of us here with these outbursts. This implies that you like us to the degree your personal validation craves our acceptance
Round 2
Forfeited
Published:
Extend
Added:
--> @RationalMadman
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: RationalMadman // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 7-points to Pro
>Reason for Decision: Apologetic counter vote-bob
>Reason for Mod Action: While this is a troll debate, it is also a full-forfeit. Where these two moderation paradigms conflict, it is important for reasons of fairness to prefer the latter. Because the voter is voting for the debater that committed the full-forfeit, their vote is removable.
************************************************************************
#3
Added:
--> @Ramshutu
Vote bomb. I hate auto fail
#2
Added:
--> @Virtuoso
Vote bob; he is unapologetic
Contender
#1
#8
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full forfeit
#7
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Forfeiture.
#6
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
FF
#5
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
I'm tired of debates that center an argument around something unprovable, like someone's personal opinion. There is technically no way for Con to prove that Pro's opinion is, especially in contradiction to what Pro says.
If the argument cannot be logically made, then it is not a debate. As it is not a debate, Pro loses automatically for creating a false debate. There isn't technically a clause in the CoC about this, but there should be.
Conduct goes to Con because Pro purposely created an undebatable topic.
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Apoplectic anti-counterclimatic vote blob
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Unapologetic vote bob.
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
I can't believe you accepted the debate. I wanted to but guess you did.
The Instigator/Pro forfeited half the Rounds which can be seen with Type1 forfeting Round 2. This meant Ramshutu did not recieve a rebuttal to his claims and went unchallenged.
Bad conduct.
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro FF half of the rounds, that's poor conduct.