Instigator
Points: 17

Communism are the best system ever conveiced of by man

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 6 votes the winner is ...
Ramshutu
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Education
Time for argument
One day
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender
Points: 42
Description
No information
Round 1
Published:
in cokmmunism tyou have the means of production for everythione instead of a fat jewish kyke nigger owning your balls
Published:
The best system ever invented or conceived of by man is the process of differential diagnosis. 

This allows a doctor to examine an individual, and use a specialized diagnostic methodology to be able to quickly reach a helpful diagnosis of an individual. 

For example, if a rabid idiot begins posting pointless and nonsensical debates on a random debate website, a psychologist would be able to perform a differential diagnosis to determine the route cause and nature of this individuals obvious personality disorder and medicate as necessary.
Round 2
Forfeited
Published:
Extend!

Added:
--> @RationalMadman
The interpretation moderation uses of that rule automatically deletes (that is, moderates) votes which vote for the forfeiting side of the full forfeit. It is prohibited to vote for the FFing side. You may dislike the rule, but it is going to be enforced. This is not really up for debate, RM.
#8
Added:
--> @bsh1
No it isn't. It says they will be moderated as any other vote would, when against the non-forfeiting side.
#7
Added:
--> @RationalMadman
How? Because it is prohibited. You may dislike the rule, but it will be enforced nonetheless.
#6
Added:
--> @bsh1
How so? Does he explain anything of my arguments at all?
#5
Added:
--> @RationalMadman
In a full forfeit situation, you are never allowed to vote for the forfeiting side.
#4
Added:
--> @bsh1
What more explanation do you need? You're allowed to vote the forfeiting side if you explain why from their arguments.
#3
Added:
--> @RationalMadman
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: RationalMadman // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 3 points to Pro for arguments
>Reason for Decision: Pro clearly communicated their theory but both sides seemed ambiguous. It felt like Con was playing semantic games and just overloading me with information and trying too hard, I just couldn't grasp it. Pro clearly states how sharing the means of production rather than leaving it to a select few is optimal.
>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit debate. Per the site's voting policy, full-forfeit debates are not moderated unless the voter voted for the forfeiting side. Because the voter voted for the forfeiting side, this vote will be removed.
************************************************************************
#2
Added:
*********************
Mod note: This is a FF debate so vote such as Pinkfreud08 are not moderated unless they vote for the forfeiting side
*********************
#1
#6
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro ff thats poor conduct
#5
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Con is lucky type1 forfeited.
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro’s first argument was captivating, but Con swooped in with quite the rebuttal. I’ll have to give him arguments
Jk full forfeit essentially so nah
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Clean up on Aisle 14. Only Con offered arguments, grammar, or conduct worth mentioning. If Con would add a source next time I'll give him that point too.
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full forfeit
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro ff half of the rounds and spelled communism and you wrong.