1266
rating
119
debates
15.97%
won
Topic
#858
Communism are the best system ever conveiced of by man
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 6 votes and with 25 points ahead, the winner is...
Ramshutu
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- One day
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
1764
rating
43
debates
94.19%
won
Description
No information
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Pro ff thats poor conduct
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Con is lucky type1 forfeited.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Pro’s first argument was captivating, but Con swooped in with quite the rebuttal. I’ll have to give him arguments
Jk full forfeit essentially so nah
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Clean up on Aisle 14. Only Con offered arguments, grammar, or conduct worth mentioning. If Con would add a source next time I'll give him that point too.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Full forfeit
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Pro ff half of the rounds and spelled communism and you wrong.
The interpretation moderation uses of that rule automatically deletes (that is, moderates) votes which vote for the forfeiting side of the full forfeit. It is prohibited to vote for the FFing side. You may dislike the rule, but it is going to be enforced. This is not really up for debate, RM.
No it isn't. It says they will be moderated as any other vote would, when against the non-forfeiting side.
How? Because it is prohibited. You may dislike the rule, but it will be enforced nonetheless.
How so? Does he explain anything of my arguments at all?
In a full forfeit situation, you are never allowed to vote for the forfeiting side.
What more explanation do you need? You're allowed to vote the forfeiting side if you explain why from their arguments.
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: RationalMadman // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 3 points to Pro for arguments
>Reason for Decision: Pro clearly communicated their theory but both sides seemed ambiguous. It felt like Con was playing semantic games and just overloading me with information and trying too hard, I just couldn't grasp it. Pro clearly states how sharing the means of production rather than leaving it to a select few is optimal.
>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit debate. Per the site's voting policy, full-forfeit debates are not moderated unless the voter voted for the forfeiting side. Because the voter voted for the forfeiting side, this vote will be removed.
************************************************************************
*********************
Mod note: This is a FF debate so vote such as Pinkfreud08 are not moderated unless they vote for the forfeiting side
*********************