Instigator / Pro
4
1481
rating
11
debates
40.91%
won
Topic

Fetuses as a replacement for the USD

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
0
3
Sources points
2
2
Spelling and grammar points
1
1
Conduct points
1
1

With 1 vote and 3 points ahead, the winner is ...

Ragnar
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Art
Time for argument
Two days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
12,000
Required rating
1501
Contender / Con
7
1766
rating
36
debates
100.0%
won
Description
~ 181 / 5,000

Specifically, fetuses aborted prior to 5 months. These fetuses currently have no value, as evidenced by the debate: https://www.debateart.com/debates/654

I propose we change that.

Added:
Contender
--> @Speedrace

I hope you enjoyed the rest of the debate. And of course, please vote.

Added:
Instigator
--> @Ragnar

I did provide the reason, directly prior to the link. "These fetuses currently have no value. ..." Admittedly, I meant moral value specifically because I didn't want to debate the morality of abortion.

Perhaps if you find it so easy to confuse his arguments with this supremacism the connection isn't entirely arbitrary. I never once mentioned it during the debate aside from using it to assist in framing, this is a conclusion you've drawn entirely on your own with no indication from myself.

Added:
Contender
--> @Tiwaz

If not trying to straw-person certain arguments to which you lost the previous debate, then please inform us of your real intent and opinion of said arguments?

Added:
Instigator
--> @Ragnar

If I was straw-manning an opposing viewpoint it may have been more logical for me to have not chosen such a title. Something innocuous, if that was my goal, would have been a better choice.

Added:
--> @Tiwaz

PHEW

Added:
Instigator
--> @Speedrace

--- DO NOT TAKE THIS COMMENT INTO CONSIDERATION IN ANY VOTES ---

Obviously this was not a serious debate, my real views are directly contrary to this.

Added:

goat

Added:
--> @Ragnar

You’re a genius

Added:
--> @Wrick-It-Ralph

Lol

Added:
--> @Tiwaz

only about your mental status. lol

Added:
Instigator
--> @Wrick-It-Ralph

Do you have any more specific concerns?

Added:
--> @Tiwaz

Oh dear.

Added:
Instigator
--> @Ragnar

Typo in my counter-argument, I meant to say "it's likely this will be banned in any other modern society."

Added:
--> @Tiwaz

But is it how YOU choose to view it?

Added:
Instigator
--> @Speedrace

Sure, if that's how you choose to view it.

Added:
--> @Tiwaz

Haha, that's a funny joke, right?

Added:
Instigator
--> @Ragnar

I made several typos, under the Feasibility section I meant to write "babies," not "children."

Added:
Contender

Take all the time you need.

Added:
Instigator
--> @Ragnar

I will post my argument later tonight or tomorrow, depending upon my schedule. I hope this doesn't inconvenience you.