1503
rating
26
debates
46.15%
won
Topic
#867
Vaccination is a scam
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 7 votes and with 20 points ahead, the winner is...
Club
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 9,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
1551
rating
9
debates
66.67%
won
Description
No information
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Concession and role confusion. I hope you each argue this against from the sides you prefer (not against each other, since you both wanted the same side).
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Pro needs to be more careful of what side they're on. Conduct to Con
Concession. Arguments to Con.
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
nolo contendere
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Concession
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Pretty much a concession. This is why it's important to look at which side you are arguing for.
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Con made a debate intentionally designed to trap noobs. Pro was new to the site and thought they were on the Con side.
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Pro negates the resolution.
Ahh, you guys don't get too upset over this. I made a mistake in determining which side the instigator was for. I've learned from my mistake and my opponent gets an easy win. No harm, no foul. 😃😃
*******************************************************************
Vote Reported: Debaticus // Mod Action: Removed
Points awarded: All points to pro
RFD: Trying to tie up pro to keep him from a debate loss
Reason for mod action: This is a conceded debate. As such, it is impermissible to vote for the forfeiting side. Furthermore, it is also against the COC to vote in order to prevent someone from loosing. This vote is considered a vote bomb. Finally, this user is not elliable to vote.
*******************************************************************
I'm also going to add that this is not a noob trap debate. The resolution was clear as well as which side the contender was arguing.
Ayyy nice
*******************************************************************
Reported Vote: Speedrace Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 7 point to pro
>Reason for Decision: This is clearly a noob trap...I might get reported for this but whatever, you shouldn’t intentionally make debates such as this
>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is considered a conceded debate. Conceded debates votes are normally unmoderated unless the balance of points are cast in favour of the conceding side. As the voter casts 7 points to the conceding side, this vote is considered invalid.
*******************************************************************
Also, I don't think of Skept as a noob- he was good debater on DDO as I remember & has been on this site since inception.
Welp, if it gets removed, it gets removed
I'm actually a noob myself, but I didn't mean to create a so called "noob trap". I just transferred this debate from DDO, and I was con. Even them Speedrace, you shouldn't make Pro get all the points, only conduct. It was clear that he conceded, so I would get the better arguments