1467
rating
2
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#881
I believe in the regulation of firearms! Change My Mind?
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 4 votes and with 16 points ahead, the winner is...
Our_Boat_is_Right
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
1500
rating
16
debates
40.63%
won
Description
No information
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Full forfeit
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
All Rounds other than R1 forfeited.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
forfeit > 1/2 conduct to Con.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
I would like to start off by thanking both voters for this debate
POOR CONDUCT:
Pro has forfeited the majority of the debate rounds which is a prime example of bad debate conduct
I ask for other voters to please consider this fact when voting in the conduct category as well.
Your time to put a funny meme or vine in there. He forfeit.
You started the debate so you make an argument first in the opening round. I then post an argument after you do.
ok so let me here your argument?
I can tell from curlykid his arguments will be weak. Plz don't rebut to him in the comments because you might convince him and I want to debate him on it.
If he isn't given arguments in the comments. He would be more focused on the debate at hand.
As of the time of this comment, curlyhair kid has some time. Over 48 hours of it in fact.
Focus on giving an argument. It is a waste to argue in the comments of a debate when you are supposed to be debating in that very debate.
How would 5 innocent people die? I don't think innocents die from self defense. Also, lets say that thieves are threatening to rob your house. They all have pistols. If you have the bigger gun, they'll be too scared to rob your house out of fear of getting shot and killed. At the sight of your AK 47, they run away from the house. No one gets shot. No injuries. Just a prevented robbery thanks to the unshot AK 47.
lemme give you an example: Imagine your neighbor gets robbed by three thieves but he grabs his ak 47 and riddles bullets all over the house, unfortunately 5 innocent people died because your neighbor was being allowed to own a automatic rifle, even though he mightve had the best intentions
Can you cite that?
Autistic people have the lowest crime rate and highest rate of success as detectives of any mind-type on Earth.
AK 47s defend against multiple people. Its much harder to do that with a pistol. Criminals have incentive to work in packs since they are more likely to achieve their desired result which is to steal stuff.
Do you think autistic people should be allowed to get a gun?
I support the banning of bump stocks and i also support the ban of military style weapons,
Too what extent? Banning ALL guns or just some restrictions?
What sort of regulations do you support. You need to add more information so other users understand the debate.