Instigator / Pro
1
1462
rating
3
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#883

Atheism is pointless

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
1
2

After 3 votes and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

Ramshutu
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One day
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
2
1764
rating
43
debates
94.19%
won
Description

We will be debating atheism and if it has a point to believing in it.

-->
@swetepete540

If trying to reply to someone, put their name in the receivers textbox, otherwise they will not get a notification.

"did not say that christians are terrorists"
The threat of 'do what I want or be tortured,' is itself a terrorist threat. If it doesn't count because you believe you are right, would mean the 9/11 terrorist attacks were not acts of terror, because they thought they were right and that god was on their side.

-->
@Barney

*******************************************************************
Vote Reported: Ragnar // Mod Action: Not Removed

Points awarded: Con

Reason for mod action: The vote was found to be sufficient per the site voting policy standards.
*******************************************************************

virtuoso the vote that I reported the first time was based on opinions before the argument that's why I reported it it is not valid.

also in wikipedia the information doesn't have to be valid anyone can put whatever they want to on wikipedia that's why the sources are invalid.

I am a male btw also did not say that christians are terrorists

-->
@RationalMadman

*******************************************************************
Vote Reported: RationalMadman // Mod Action: Not Removed

Points awarded: Con

Reason for mod action: This vote is sufficient.
*******************************************************************

I did not have anything else to say and I thought I had more time

-->
@Wrick-It-Ralph

*******************************************************************
Vote Reported: Wirck-It-Ralph // Mod Action: Not Removed

Points awarded: Con

Reason for mod action: This vote is borderline. Per our standards, a borderline vote is deemed sufficient.

*******************************************************************

-->
@Debaticus

*******************************************************************
Vote Reported: Debaticus // Mod Action: Removed

Points awarded: Con

RFD: Very simple. amazing arguments, followed by concession.

Reason for mod action: To cast a sufficient vote in the choose winner system, a voter must explicitly, and in the text of their RFD, perform the following tasks: (a) survey the main arguments and counterarguments presented in the debate, (b) weigh those arguments against each other (or explain why certain arguments need not be weighed based on what transpired within the debate itself), and (c) explain how, through the process of weighing, they arrived at their voting decision with regard to assigning argument points. Weighing entails analyzing how the relative strength of one argument or set of arguments outweighed (that is, out-impacted) and/or precluded another argument or set of arguments. Weighing requires analyzing and situating arguments and counterarguments within the context of the debate as a whole. Furthermore, one forfeited round does is not equivalent to a concession.

Most significantly, the voter fails to meet the eligability requirements. In order to be elligable to vote, the voter must first read the COC (found here: https://www.debateart.com/rules) and complete two non-troll/non-forfeited debates. The voter fails to meet both requirements.
*******************************************************************

-->
@InFakeWars

Is it, tho? I consider Wikipedia a very acceptable go-to. What is your objection?

-->
@Ramshutu

Who uses Wikipedia for 7/10 sources?!?! That's REALLY horrible to source XD

-->
@swetepete540

Only 3 hours left

*sigh* These arguments though

can you make another of this debate? I want to argue the points of atheism.