Women’s suffrage was a mistake
All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.
With 6 votes and 20 points ahead, the winner is ...
- Publication date
- Last update date
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Voting system
- Open voting
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Four points
- Rating mode
- Characters per argument
This is an interesting topic, something this site currently lacks.
Personally, I think Pro is on the right side, but convincing people through debate of something politically incorrect, is quite difficult (debates are quasi popularity contests), especially when the truth is rooted in underlying values not currently valued.
Lulz. "Women should not vote because the result would be democracy."
Should be an interesting debate though. Hope you get someone to loan you a laptop or something, Wylted.
I thought I had 72 hours on the transhumance debate, just got off of work and saw less than 15 minutes left. You can take an extra round
Socialism is objectively correct. I dare you to debate me on it.
Don't forget to reply to the Transhumanism debate. You don't have much time left.
I can’t take that seriously from a socialist LOl.
Your political ideology is retarded. You should be restricted from saying dumb shit on the internet.
My political ideology was formed prior to becoming a Christian, but yes I believe the ends justify the means. So it may be inherently unfair to prevent women from voting but if the result is a better economic system with less poverty and overall suffering, than their vote should be restricted.
You are a massive dick head who deserves to be shot directly in the face. You think women should not have equal standing in society just because they tend to disagree with you about your ignorant bible thumping redneck politics? You sir, are an ignoramus, and a sexist banjo strumming wanker doodle.
Damn cellphone. Nobody likes reading walls of texts. I need to use a real computer.
I did not figure this out until just now but I think I’ll start off with using hypergamy as a premise somehow. Not sure as a premise for what but an artist let’s his work speak.
I’m literally stuck on a Greyhound for the next 12 hours so I have nothing better to do
Definitely willing to look for holes and give you the route I would likely look to go in the rebuttal round. We are so different. I don’t even know my arguments until somebody accepts my debate. I just have a general feel for the arguments and see where that takes me
If you want ill send you the construct I have for that UBC debate. I feel I constructed a solid AF case 🤔, def want some independent perspective on that
Thanks, I can actually dedicate time to research and argue this one as well since I am out of town without family at the moment, so I’ll put up a fight. I thought about accepting yours and arguing devil’s advocate but I thought this would be more fun
I saw a post where you mentioned being geographia.
This should be an excellent debate. Two talented debaters going at it. Im looking forward to reading this! 👏
Wait, do you know who I am? I'm Geographia. No matter.
You have improved a to. Since your first debate. This will be challenging. I have slowly gotten worse on the other hand, but I want to be top of this leaderboard so we’ll see what happens
Correct please do
However, to be clear, you are arguing that more harm than good came from the 19th amendment?
I'll take this senpai