Instigator / Pro
16
1387
rating
34
debates
22.06%
won
Topic
#9

Women’s suffrage was a mistake

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
15
Better sources
8
10
Better legibility
3
5
Better conduct
2
6

After 6 votes and with 20 points ahead, the winner is...

Earth
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
36
1543
rating
4
debates
100.0%
won
Description

No information

This is an interesting topic, something this site currently lacks.

Personally, I think Pro is on the right side, but convincing people through debate of something politically incorrect, is quite difficult (debates are quasi popularity contests), especially when the truth is rooted in underlying values not currently valued.

Lulz. "Women should not vote because the result would be democracy."

Should be an interesting debate though. Hope you get someone to loan you a laptop or something, Wylted.

I thought I had 72 hours on the transhumance debate, just got off of work and saw less than 15 minutes left. You can take an extra round

-->
@Wylted

Socialism is objectively correct. I dare you to debate me on it.
Don't forget to reply to the Transhumanism debate. You don't have much time left.

I can’t take that seriously from a socialist LOl.

-->
@Wylted

Your political ideology is retarded. You should be restricted from saying dumb shit on the internet.

My political ideology was formed prior to becoming a Christian, but yes I believe the ends justify the means. So it may be inherently unfair to prevent women from voting but if the result is a better economic system with less poverty and overall suffering, than their vote should be restricted.

-->
@Wylted

You are a massive dick head who deserves to be shot directly in the face. You think women should not have equal standing in society just because they tend to disagree with you about your ignorant bible thumping redneck politics? You sir, are an ignoramus, and a sexist banjo strumming wanker doodle.

Damn cellphone. Nobody likes reading walls of texts. I need to use a real computer.

I did not figure this out until just now but I think I’ll start off with using hypergamy as a premise somehow. Not sure as a premise for what but an artist let’s his work speak.

I’m literally stuck on a Greyhound for the next 12 hours so I have nothing better to do

-->
@Buddamoose

Definitely willing to look for holes and give you the route I would likely look to go in the rebuttal round. We are so different. I don’t even know my arguments until somebody accepts my debate. I just have a general feel for the arguments and see where that takes me

-->
@Wylted

If you want ill send you the construct I have for that UBC debate. I feel I constructed a solid AF case 🤔, def want some independent perspective on that

-->
@Buddamoose

Thanks, I can actually dedicate time to research and argue this one as well since I am out of town without family at the moment, so I’ll put up a fight. I thought about accepting yours and arguing devil’s advocate but I thought this would be more fun

I saw a post where you mentioned being geographia.

This should be an excellent debate. Two talented debaters going at it. Im looking forward to reading this! 👏

Wait, do you know who I am? I'm Geographia. No matter.

You have improved a to. Since your first debate. This will be challenging. I have slowly gotten worse on the other hand, but I want to be top of this leaderboard so we’ll see what happens

Correct please do

-->
@Wylted

However, to be clear, you are arguing that more harm than good came from the 19th amendment?

I'll take this senpai