Instigator / Pro
Points: 77

Does the God of the Bible, in both Testaments, exist?

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 11 votes the winner is ...
YeshuaRedeemed
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Religion
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender / Con
Points: 23
Description
I promise not to be abusive, or judgemental.
Round 1
Published:
I am not the best at apologetics, but I will do my best that God exists. Let's start by me saying that I have trouble understanding how nature and the universe are possible without God having created them? I also don't know how evolution is possible, but I do want to stay on topic. My position is this: The Bible was in my Christian opinion inspired by God, written by holy men from all walks of life. When properly translated, and interpreted, the Bible does not contradict itsself. Are skeptics telling me the Bible was written over several millennia, when properly translated offer no contradictions, and how is it not true? I want you to watch a video, and comment on this debate, what your thoughts are. Here is the video, for anyone to watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajqH4y8G0MI Please tell me what you think, and depending on your response, I will provide more evidence shortly.
Forfeited
Round 2
Forfeited
Forfeited
Round 3
Forfeited
Forfeited
Round 4
Forfeited
Forfeited
Added:
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments ✔ ✗ ✗ 3 points
Better sources ✔ ✗ ✗ 2 points
Better spelling and grammar ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Better conduct ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Reason: tie for flluf
#8
Added:
--> @Speedrace
Just saw it at my debate with him
#7
Added:
--> @Dr.Franklin
How do you even know he made a comment to you? lol
#6
Added:
--> @BrotherDThomas
Satanic BrotherDThomas,
lol
#5
Added:
.
Satanic Dr. Franklin,
OH LOOK!!! Dr. Franklin cannot come up with his own words, so he has to COPY MINE when I state he is Satanic for calling Jesus a LIAR in our debate! How original and child like can Dr. Franklin be, NOT!
Yes, she was outlining her debate protocols, but TRY and use logic 101 for a change, IN OUTLINING her debate, she said what she will not do, therefore it is candy ass to Jesus' MO in the Temple, GET IT?! HELLO DR. FRANKLIN, ANYBODY HOME TODAY?! LOL!!!
OMG, you continue to remove one foot to insert the other at all times, how embarrassing for you AGAIN!
Get your pagan ass back into the DEBATE that you made specifically for me, where you are continually made the fool, you don't have time to linger in any comment section to HIDE from said debate, understood?
.
#4
Added:
--> @BrotherDThomas
Satanic BrotherDThomas,
what the fuck is the matter with you. She was just outlying what she will do for the debate.
#3
Added:
Bump.
#2
Added:
.
YeshuaRedeemed,
YOUR QUOTE: "I promise not to be abusive, or judgemental."
Why would you take your candy-assed position when proving Jesus as Yahweh God incarnate in existing? I act within the same way my Jesus did when he was upset with the money changers in the Temple by violently over turning their tables in a very emotive way! He has set an example for us to act in the same manner. Although I do not make a whip of cords to beat the Atheists and ignorant Christians with, like our ever loving and forgiving Jesus did towards the money changers, but instead, I beat them with His inspired word within the scriptures!

“When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. In the temple courts he found people selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. To those who sold doves he said, “Get these out of here! Stop turning my Father’s house into a market!” (John 2:13-16)
As shown above, our Jesus was a man's man tough guy with a "take no prisoner" modus operandi, praise!
.
#1
#11
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
A little odd that by definition both full forfeited, but con did so with capital F's.
#10
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro forfeited less
#9
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro was the only one who even made an argument, plus Con forfeited every round.
#8
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
rfd in comments
#7
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
forfeit
#6
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Both sides forfeited, but pro actually came up with argument
#5
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
FF
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
While both FF the majority of the debate, pro at least provided a decent opening argument.
Since this technically counts as a full forfeit by con, I must award all points to pro.
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Con behaved badly by forfeiting every round
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro is the only one to make an argument
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full forfeit.